How to fit a response time distribution
- PMID: 11082851
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03214357
How to fit a response time distribution
Abstract
Among the most valuable tools in behavioral science is statistically fitting mathematical models of cognition to data--response time distributions, in particular. However, techniques for fitting distributions very widely, and little is known about the efficacy of different techniques. In this article, we assess several fitting techniques by simulating six widely cited models of response time and using the fitting procedures to recover model parameters. The techniques include the maximization of likelihood and least squares fits of the theoretical distributions to different empirical estimates of the simulated distributions. A running example is used to illustrate the different estimation and fitting procedures. The simulation studies reveal that empirical density estimates are biased even for very large sample sizes. Some fitting techniques yield more accurate and less variable parameter estimates than do others. Methods that involve least squares fits to density estimates generally yield very poor parameter estimates.
Similar articles
-
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7. Behav Res Methods. 2016. PMID: 26174714
-
Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(4):365-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645040-00003. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006. PMID: 16584284
-
Testing specific hypotheses by fitting underlying distributions to categorical data.J Biopharm Stat. 1994 Mar;4(1):53-64. doi: 10.1080/10543409408835072. J Biopharm Stat. 1994. PMID: 8019584
-
QMLE: fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles.Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Nov;35(4):485-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03195527. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003. PMID: 14748492 Review.
-
Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):798-817. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.798. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009. PMID: 19815782 Review.
Cited by
-
When one size does not fit all: a simple statistical method to deal with across-individual variations of effects.PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039059. Epub 2012 Jun 18. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22723931 Free PMC article.
-
On the Relation Between the (Censored) Shifted Wald and the Wiener Distribution as Measurement Models for Choice Response Times.Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Mar;42(2):116-135. doi: 10.1177/0146621617710465. Epub 2017 May 30. Appl Psychol Meas. 2018. PMID: 29881116 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-benefit and distributional analyses of accessory stimuli.Psychol Res. 2012 Sep;76(5):626-33. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0372-1. Epub 2011 Aug 12. Psychol Res. 2012. PMID: 21837462
-
Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1440-1465. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1025-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 27311696 Review.
-
Drift-diffusion explains response variability and capacity for tracking objects.Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 2;9(1):11224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47624-4. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31375761 Free PMC article.