Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: how different are smokers and nonsmokers?
- PMID: 11089293
- PMCID: PMC6980009
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03404811
Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: how different are smokers and nonsmokers?
Abstract
Using data from a 1996 random-digit-dialing computer-assisted telephone survey of Ontario adults, 424 smokers and 1,340 nonsmokers were compared regarding knowledge about the health effects of tobacco use, attitudes toward restrictions on smoking and other tobacco control measures, and predictions of compliance with more restrictions. The response rate was 65%. Smokers were less knowledgeable than nonsmokers. Smokers were also less likely to support bans on smoking in specific locations, but majorities of both groups supported some restriction in most settings. Smokers were more likely than nonsmokers to predict that most smokers would comply with more restrictions, and more than three quarters indicated that they, themselves, would comply. Sizable proportions of both groups, especially smokers, failed to appreciate the effectiveness of taxation in reducing smoking. Support for other control measures also differed by smoking status. Both knowledge and smoking status were independently associated with support for more restrictions and other tobacco control policy measures.
À partir de données recueillies en 1996 lors d’un sondage téléphonique à numéros aléatoires assisté par ordinateur et mené auprès d’adultes de l’Ontario, nous avons comparé les réponses de 424 fumeurs et de 1 340 non-fumeurs concernant les effets du tabagisme sur la santé, les attitudes à l’égard de restrictions et d’autres mesures de contrôle de l’usage du tabac et les prédictions quant au respect de restrictions plus nombreuses. Le taux de réponse au sondage a été de 65 %. Les fumeurs avaient moins de connaissances que les non-fumeurs. Les fumeurs étaient également moins portés à appuyer l’interdiction de fumer à certains endroits précis, mais la majorité des répondants des deux groupes appuyaient l’idée d’imposer certaines restrictions dans la plupart des endroits. Les fumeurs étaient plus portés que les non-fumeurs à prédire que la plupart des fumeurs se conformeraient à un plus grand nombre de restrictions; plus des trois-quarts d’entre eux ont indiqué qu’eux-mêmes s’y conformeraient. Une grande proportion des deux groupes, surtout parmi les fumeurs, ne croyait pas que les taxes étaient un moyen efficace de réduire l’usage du tabac. Les deux groupes ne donnaient pas le même appui à d’autres mesures de contrôle du tabagisme. La connaissance et le statut de fumeur ou de non-fumeur étaient associés de façon indépendante à l’appui donné à des restrictions plus nombreuses et à d’autres mesures de contrôle de l’usage du tabac.
Similar articles
-
Support among smokers and nonsmokers for restrictions on smoking.Am J Prev Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;11(5):283-7. Am J Prev Med. 1995. PMID: 8573356
-
US adult attitudes and practices regarding smoking restrictions and child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: changes in the social climate from 2000-2001.Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):e55-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.e55. Pediatrics. 2003. PMID: 12837906
-
Support for tobacco control interventions: do country of origin and socioeconomic status make a difference?Int J Public Health. 2012 Oct;57(5):777-86. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0378-5. Epub 2012 Jun 20. Int J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22714136 Free PMC article.
-
A population survey on legislative measures to restrict smoking in Ontario: 3. Variables related to attitudes of smokers and nonsmokers.Am J Prev Med. 1989 Nov-Dec;5(6):313-22. Am J Prev Med. 1989. PMID: 2597426
-
The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(4):338-53. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200407000-00011. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004. PMID: 15235381 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions of Tobacco Price Policy among Students from Sapienza University of Rome: Can This Policy Mitigate Smoking Addiction and Its Health Impacts?Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 4;12(9):944. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090944. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38727502 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and attitudes toward cigarette and narghile smoking among previous smokers in Lebanon.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):14100-14107. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07763-y. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32037494
-
In favour of tobacco control? Former smokers' support for tobacco policies.Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Dec;36(6):496-510. doi: 10.1177/1455072519853914. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019. PMID: 32934583 Free PMC article.
-
Interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places: a qualitative study.Can J Public Health. 1999 Sep-Oct;90(5):330-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03404522. Can J Public Health. 1999. PMID: 10570578 Free PMC article.
-
Smokers' support for tobacco endgame measures in Canada: findings from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Smoking and Vaping Survey.CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E412-E422. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180025. Print 2018 Jul-Sep. CMAJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30266779 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, et al. Mortality from Smoking in Developed Countries 1950–2000: Indirect Estimates from National Vital Statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
-
- Makomaski Illing EM, Kaiserman MJ. Mortality attributable to tobacco use in Canada and its regions, 1991. Can J Public Health. 1995;86:257–65. - PubMed
-
- Kaiserman MJ. The cost of smoking in Canada, 1991. Chron Dis Can. 1997;18:13–19. - PubMed
-
- Health Canada, Statistics Canada, and the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Statistical Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa: 1999.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical