Evaluation of the lower extremity veins in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparison of helical CT venography and sonography. 2000 ARRS Executive Council Award I. American Roentgen Ray Society
- PMID: 11090368
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751525
Evaluation of the lower extremity veins in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparison of helical CT venography and sonography. 2000 ARRS Executive Council Award I. American Roentgen Ray Society
Abstract
Objective: In patients undergoing a combined CT angiographic and CT venographic protocol, the accuracy of helical CT venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis was compared with that of lower extremity sonography.
Materials and methods: Patients who had undergone a combined CT angiographic and CT venographic protocol and sonography of the lower extremities within 1 week were identified. The final reports were evaluated for the presence or absence of deep venous thrombosis. Statistical measures for the identification of deep venous thrombosis with helical CT venography were calculated. In each true-positive case, the location of the thrombus identified with both techniques was compared. All false-positive and false-negative cases were reviewed to identify the reasons for the discrepancies.
Results: Seventy-four patients were included. There were eight patients (11%) with true-positive findings, 61 patients (82%) with true-negative findings, four patients (5%) with false-positive findings, and one patient (1%) with a false-negative finding. When comparing helical CT venography with sonography for the detection of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, the sensitivity measured 89%; specificity, 94%; positive predictive value, 67%; negative predictive value, 98%; and accuracy, 93%. Of the eight true-positive cases, five had sites of thrombus that were in agreement on both CT venography and sonography. Of the five discordant cases, four were false-positives and one was a false-negative. Possible explanations for all discrepancies were identified.
Conclusion: Compared with sonography, CT venography had a 93% accuracy in identifying deep venous thrombosis. However, the positive predictive value of only 67% for CT venography suggests that sonography should be used to confirm the presence of isolated deep venous thrombosis before anticoagulation is initiated. In addition, interpretation of CT venography should be performed with knowledge of certain pitfalls.
Similar articles
-
Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography.Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):498-502. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma26498. Radiology. 2001. PMID: 11323478
-
Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Oct;175(4):997-1001. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1750997. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 11000152
-
Deep venous thrombosis: comparison of indirect multidetector CT venography and sonography of lower extremities in 26 patients.Clin Imaging. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):439-44. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00319-X. Clin Imaging. 2004. PMID: 15531146
-
Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a comprehensive review.Radiographics. 2002 Oct;22 Spec No:S3-19; discussion S20-4. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.suppl_1.g02oc17s3. Radiographics. 2002. PMID: 12376597 Review.
-
Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12 Suppl 1):I15-21. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000122871.86662.72. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15051664 Review.
Cited by
-
Endovascular Treatment for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: An Overview.Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jun;22(6):931-943. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0675. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Korean J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33660456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CT venography vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism.Emerg Radiol. 2007 Nov;14(6):403-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-007-0654-5. Epub 2007 Jul 26. Emerg Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17653779
-
Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Dec;6(6):493-507. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.12.06. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016. PMID: 28123971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Diagnostic assessment of perioperative thromboembolism].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;159(19-20):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s10354-009-0714-4. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2009. PMID: 19898789 Review. German.
-
Radiofrequency Ablation and Concomitant Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Varicose Veins (VV): Perspectives from a Developing Country.Ann Vasc Dis. 2021 Dec 25;14(4):341-347. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.21-00027. Ann Vasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 35082939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical