Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction
- PMID: 11090675
- DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00225-x
Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction
Abstract
A flash that is presented aligned with a moving stimulus appears to lag behind the position of the moving stimulus. This flash-lag phenomenon reflects a processing advantage for moving stimuli (Metzger, W. (1932) Psychologische Forschung 16, 176-200; MacKay, D. M. (1958) Nature 181, 507-508; Nijhawan, R. (1994) Nature 370, 256-257; Purushothaman, G., Patel, S.S., Bedell, H.E., & Ogmen, H. (1998) Nature 396, 424; Whitney, D. & Murakami, I. (1998) Nature Neuroscience 1, 656-657). The present study measures the sensitivity of the illusion to unpredictable changes in the direction of motion. A moving stimulus translated upwards and then made a 90 degrees turn leftward or rightward. The flash-lag illusion was measured and it was found that, although the change in direction was unpredictable, the flash was still perceived to lag behind the moving stimulus at all points along the trajectory, a finding that is at odds with the extrapolation hypothesis (Nijhawan, R. (1994) Nature 370, 256-257). The results suggest that there is a shorter latency of the neural response to motion even during unpredictable changes in direction. The latency facilitation therefore appears to be omnidirectional rather than specific to a predictable path of motion (Grzywacz, N. M. & Amthor, F. R. (1993) Journal of Neurophysiology 69, 2188-2199).
Similar articles
-
Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;40(30):5698-5705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-20.2020. J Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32699152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2430-2452. doi: 10.1152/jn.00792.2017. Epub 2018 Aug 22. J Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30365390 Free PMC article.
-
Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli.Vision Res. 2000;40(2):137-49. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00166-2. Vision Res. 2000. PMID: 10793892
-
Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect.J Vis. 2009 May 8;9(5):4.1-8. doi: 10.1167/9.5.4. J Vis. 2009. PMID: 19757882
-
The flash-lag effect and related mislocalizations: findings, properties, and theories.Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):308-38. doi: 10.1037/a0032899. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID: 23796268 Review.
Cited by
-
A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.J Vis. 2011 Nov 11;11(13):10.1167/11.13.12 12. doi: 10.1167/11.13.12. J Vis. 2011. PMID: 22080448 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(22):2841-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.023. Epub 2007 Sep 14. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17868767 Free PMC article.
-
An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16338-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808916105. Epub 2008 Oct 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. PMID: 18852459 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):231-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.008. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17190608 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;40(30):5698-5705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275-20.2020. J Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32699152 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources