Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Dec 20;117(1-2):83-96.
doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00297-7.

Event-related potentials as a function of movement parameter variations during motor imagery and isometric action

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Event-related potentials as a function of movement parameter variations during motor imagery and isometric action

D H Romero et al. Behav Brain Res. .

Abstract

Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have shown that executed action and motor imagery activate common neuronal substrates, leading to the hypothesis that movement preparation and motor imagery are functionally equivalent processes. This study further tested the functional equivalence hypothesis by determining whether electrocortical patterns associated with variations in motor control parameters are similar during imagined and executed actions. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from the supplementary motor/premotor area (SMA/PMA; FCz site) and primary motor area (M1; C3, C4 sites) during an executed and an imagined, cued, discrete isometric contraction task while target force (TF; low, moderate) and rate of force development (RFD; slow, rapid) were varied. For M1, the correlation of ERPs between moderate- and low force-executions was near zero and N2 amplitude was greater for moderate than low force executions, indicating that M1 activity is related to TF. Rapid executions were greater in amplitude and longer in latency than slow executions and the ERPs for rapid- and slow-executions were negatively correlated, indicating that M1 activity is also related to RFD. There were no differences in N2 amplitude and a zero correlation between execution and imagined actions of similar TF and RFD, indicating that neither TF or RFD are represented in M1 activity during imagery. For SMA/PMA, there was a moderate correlation between moderate- and low force-executions and larger N2 amplitude for moderate- than for low force-executions, indicating that TF may be related to SMA/PMA electrocortical activity. ERP patterns were uncorrelated between rapid- and slow-execution at FCz, but N2 amplitude was the same, making it unclear whether the RFD parameter is represented in FCz activity. The correlational and N2 amplitude analyses demonstrate that patterns of electrocortical activity at SMA/PMA are nearly isomorphic during executed and imagined actions as TF and RFD are varied. These results provide evidence that patterns of electrocortical activity associated with variations in the parameters of executed action are similar during motor imagery at SMA/PMA but not at M1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources