Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Dec;43(6):1017-23.
doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.108369.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral calcitriol for the treatment of localized and systemic scleroderma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral calcitriol for the treatment of localized and systemic scleroderma

M M Hulshof et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Various treatments including corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, D-penicillamine, interferon gamma, cyclosporine, and cytostatic drugs have been used with limited success in both morphea and systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Objective: We investigated the effect of treatment with oral calcitriol in patients with localized or systemic scleroderma.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 9 months' duration with a 6-month follow-up was performed at the Department of Dermatology. A total of 27 patients (7 patients with SSc and 20 with morphea) were selected on a minimal skin score of 3 for patients with morphea and 12 for those with SSc. Each patient received calcitriol (0.75 microg/day for 6 months plus 1.25 microg/day for 3 months) or placebo for 9 months. Efficacy parameters included skin score, measurement of serum markers of collagen synthesis and degradation and, additional for the patients with SSc, oral aperture measurements, lung function studies, and esophagus motility.

Results: The skin score in patients with morphea after 9 months' treatment showed no significant difference between the placebo and calcitriol groups (mean percentage reduction [SD] in skin score in the placebo group was -29.3 [57.9]; in the calcitriol group it was -19.4 [46.6]). The small group of patients with SSc was inadequate to allow us to draw any conclusions regarding efficacy. No significant change was found in the serum markers of collagen metabolism.

Conclusion: In this study calcitriol was not more effective than placebo in patients with morphea. Because of the small group of patients with SSc treated, no conclusions regarding efficacy in SSc can be drawn.

PubMed Disclaimer