Sport and exercise medicine: building the foundations of a new discipline

Abstract

New disciplines emerge as medicine evolves. But, to be recognised as a clinical discipline we must be prepared to measure ourselves against established criteria; there should be consensus on the core content of the discipline and an identifiable body of knowledge to allow us to deal with common clinical problems. At this developmental stage in our evolution we have general agreement on what defines sport and exercise medicine but, as most of our clinical skills developed empirically, research is relatively underdeveloped. The volume and quality of this research does not yet reflect a vibrant research culture. The validity of our clinical method is supported by research evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of clinical tests but the evidence supporting other areas of clinical practice is uncertain. Some aspects of prevention have become integrated into clinical practice without sufficient evidence and, screening has been introduced without critical evaluation. To ensure the future success of our discipline and achieve recognition of its value in the wider medical community, we must nurture an evaluative culture and ensure that clinical practice is built on firm foundations of research evidence.