Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Dec;38(12):4382-6.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.12.4382-4386.2000.

Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men

Affiliations

Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men

R E Johnson et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Dec.

Abstract

Urine ligase chain reaction (LCR) and PCR tests and urethral swab culture were compared for their abilities to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 3,639 asymptomatic men by using one-, two-, and three-test reference standards. Frozen urine at four of five participating centers was also tested by a transcription-mediated amplification assay which was used as a reference test. LCR increased the yield of positive results by 27% and PCR increased the yield of positive results by 26% over the yield of positive results by culture (n = 295). LCR and PCR sensitivities were similar, ranging from 80.4 to 93.5%, depending on the reference standard. Culture sensitivity was substantially less. A multiple-test standard yielded LCR, PCR, and culture specificities of 99.6%, with or without discrepant analysis. Test performance varied among centers partly due to different interpretations of the testing protocols. The study confirms that urine LCR and PCR for the detection of C. trachomatis have substantially improved sensitivities over that of urethral swab culture for testing of asymptomatic men, enabling screening of this important target group. These tests, perhaps in combination, are also candidate reference tests for the conduct of test evaluation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alonzo T A, Pepe M S. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test. Stat Med. 1999;18:2987–3003. - PubMed
    1. Black C M. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:160–184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevention through early detection and treatment of other sexually transmitted diseases—United States. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee for HIV and STD Prevention. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(No. RR-12):1–24. - PubMed
    1. Chernesky M A, Lee H, Schachter J, Burczak J D, Stamm W E, McCormack W M, Quinn T C. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:1308–1311. - PubMed
    1. Fleiss J L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1981.

Publication types