Natural selection and the function of genome imprinting: beyond the silenced minority
- PMID: 11102708
- DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02134-x
Natural selection and the function of genome imprinting: beyond the silenced minority
Abstract
Most hypotheses of the evolutionary origin of genome imprinting assume that the biochemical character on which natural selection has operated is the expression of the allele from only one parent at an affected locus. We propose an alternative - that natural selection has operated on differences in the chromatin structure of maternal and paternal chromosomes to facilitate pairing during meiosis and to maintain the distinction between homologues during DNA repair and recombination in both meiotic and mitotic cells. Maintenance of differences in chromatin structure in somatic cells can sometimes result in the transcription of only one allele at a locus. This pattern of transcription might be selected, in some instances, for reasons that are unrelated to the original establishment of the imprint. Differences in the chromatin structure of homologous chromosomes might facilitate pairing and recombination during meiosis, but some such differences could also result in non-random segregation of chromosomes, leading to parental-origin-dependent transmission ratio distortion. This hypothesis unites two broad classes of parental origin effects under a single selective force and identifies a single substrate through which Mendel's first and second laws might be violated.
Similar articles
-
Natural selection and the evolution of genome imprinting.Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:349-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143741. Annu Rev Genet. 2003. PMID: 14616065 Review.
-
The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?Curr Top Dev Biol. 1998;40:255-93. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60369-5. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1998. PMID: 9673853 Review.
-
Meiotic pairing and imprinted X chromatin assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nat Genet. 2004 Jan;36(1):100-5. doi: 10.1038/ng1283. Epub 2003 Dec 21. Nat Genet. 2004. PMID: 14702046 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic imprinting in Drosophila is maintained by the products of Suppressor of variegation and trithorax group, but not Polycomb group, genes.Mol Genet Genomics. 2002 Sep;268(1):103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00438-002-0731-0. Epub 2002 Aug 7. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002. PMID: 12242505
-
A genetic test to determine the origin of maternal transmission ratio distortion. Meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus.Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):333-42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.333. Genetics. 2000. PMID: 10628992 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Epigenetic mechanisms of genomic imprinting: common themes in the regulation of imprinted regions in mammals, plants, and insects.Genet Res Int. 2012;2012:585024. doi: 10.1155/2012/585024. Epub 2012 Feb 15. Genet Res Int. 2012. PMID: 22567394 Free PMC article.
-
Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene.Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1303-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2725. Proc Biol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15306355 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of novel imprinted differentially methylated regions by global analysis of human-parthenogenetic-induced pluripotent stem cells.Stem Cell Reports. 2013 Jun 4;1(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.03.005. eCollection 2013. Stem Cell Reports. 2013. PMID: 24052944 Free PMC article.
-
The use of mouse models to study epigenetics.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Nov 1;5(11):a017939. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017939. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013. PMID: 24186070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inter- and intra-individual variation in allele-specific DNA methylation and gene expression in children conceived using assisted reproductive technology.PLoS Genet. 2010 Jul 22;6(7):e1001033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001033. PLoS Genet. 2010. PMID: 20661447 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases