Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(10):1900-7.

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms

H R Jäger et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Intravoxel phase dispersion and flow saturation often prevent adequate depiction of intracranial giant aneurysms on 3D time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Additional diagnostic difficulties may arise from T1 contamination artifact of an associated blood clot. Our aim was to assess whether contrast-enhanced MRA could improve the evaluation of giant aneurysms and to compare two different types of contrast-enhanced MRA.

Methods: We studied 11 aneurysms in 10 patients (age range, 31-77 years) with giant aneurysms of the anterior (n = 9) and posterior (n = 2) cerebral circulation by comparing 3D-TOF, first-pass dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA, and steady-state contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF sequences. Additional comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in eight aneurysms.

Results: In nine of 11 aneurysms, 3D-TOF did not adequately show the lumen and exiting vessels. Contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA showed the aneurysm sac and exiting vessels in all of these cases. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA showed a better intravascular contrast than did contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF, which led to better delineation of the aneurysms. T1 contamination artifact from intra- or extraluminal blood clot was evident on the 3D-TOF images in four cases. The artifact was less marked on the contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF image and was completely eliminated on the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA image by subtraction of precontrast images. The diagnostic information provided by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA was comparable to that provided by DSA.

Conclusion: Precontrast 3D-TOF is inadequate for the assessment of giant cerebral aneurysms. Both contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA reliably show the aneurysm sac and connected vessels. Dynamic MRA provides a superior contrast between flow and background and eliminates T1 contamination artifact. It should therefore be considered as the MRA sequence of choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>fig</sc> 1.
fig 1.
78-year-woman with bilateral cavernous carotid aneurysms. A–D, T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) image (A) (4200/99/2 [TR/TEeff/excitations]) shows bilateral enlargement of cavernous sinus by giant aneurysms of internal carotid arteries. These are of mixed signal intensity with high signal in areas of turbulent flow. 3D-TOF (B) (40/6.9/1; flip angle, 20°) shows only the entering vessels, but not aneurysm sacs nor exiting vessels, which are seen on contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (C) (40/6.9/1/45°) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA sequences (D) (6.4/1.4/1/30°, slice thickness = 1.5 mm). These also show extension of aneurysmal dilatation into both middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). On the contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF sequence (C), the signal intensity of aneurysm sacs and distal vessels is attenuated compared with that of contrast-enhanced dynamic MRA (D), which provides excellent contrast between vessels and background
<sc>fig</sc> 2.
fig 2.
77-year-old man with giant basilar artery aneurysm. A–C, On T2-weighted FSE image (A) (5182/99/1), a giant basilar artery aneurysm is mainly of high signal. Patency of its lumen can therefore not be assumed. Targeted MIP projection of the posterior circulation from the 3D-TOF (B) (35/6/1/20°) sequences, acquired with overlapping slabs, shows the entering vessels, only a small part of the aneurysm sac, and no exiting vessels. Aneurysm and exiting vessels are well seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA sequence (C) (5/2/1/25°)
<sc>fig</sc> 3.
fig 3.
62-year-old woman with giant aneurysm of left cavernous carotid artery (CCA). A–F, early (A) and late (B) frames of DSA run after left CCA injection. Early frame (A) shows entering vessel and high-velocity inflow jet. Full extent of aneurysm sac and exiting vessels are only shown on late frame of DSA run (B) where visualization of distal vessels is faint owing to turbulent flow and contrast dilution in the aneurysm sac. MIP of 3D-TOF (C) (40/6.9/1/20°) and contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (D) (40/6.9/1/45°). Precontrast 3D-TOF (C) shows only entering vessels and high-velocity inflow jet, similar to early frame of the DSA (A), accounting for different projection angle, whereas contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (D) also shows aneurysm sac and distal vessels. Axial source images of 3D-TOF (E) and contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (F) show intraluminal clot. Low signal clot adherent to posterolateral wall of aneurysm is visible on 3D-TOF axial source images (E), but dropout of signal from nonlaminar flow anteriorly does not allow exclusion of additional clot. Interface between patent aneurysm lumen and low signal clot is much clearer on axial source images of contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (F)
<sc>fig</sc> 4.
fig 4.
31-year-old man with ruptured giant aneurysm of the right MCA. A–E, T1-weighted SE image (A) (540/11/2) shows hematoma in right temporal lobe and insula with high signal from methemoglobin. It was shown to be due to rupture of fusiform giant aneurysm of right MCA by DSA (B). On 3D-TOF image (C) (40/6.9/1/20°), aneurysm lumen is indistinguishable from surrounding T1 contamination artifact. Contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF (D) (40/6.9/1/45°) faintly delineates aneurysm but remains severely degraded by T1 contamination artifact. Note that exiting vessel and M2 branches of right MCA, not seen by use of 3D-TOF (C), are, however, visualized. The dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA findings (E) (8.7/1.8/1/30°/3 mm), which is of low spatial resolution in this case, correlate well with those of DSA (B), showing only the aneurysm lumen, and not the hematoma

References

    1. Atlas S, Sheppard L, Goldberg HI, Hurst RW, Listerud J, Flamm E. Intracranial aneurysms: detection and characterization with MR angiography with use of an advanced postprocessing technique in a blinded-reader study. Radiology 1997;203:807-814 - PubMed
    1. Huston J, Nichols DA, Luetmer PH, et al. Blinded prospective evaluation of sensitivity of MR angiography to known intracranial aneurysms: importance of aneurysm size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1607-1614 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Mabuchi N, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography with evaluation of maximum intensity projection and source images. Radiology 1996;199:199-207 - PubMed
    1. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ruggieri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;155:449-456 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuierer G, Huk WJ, Laub G. Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 1992;35:50-54 - PubMed

Publication types