Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Dec 9;321(7274):1445-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7274.1445.

Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group

G K Wilcock et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):405

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of galantamine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Design: Randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled trial.

Setting: 86 outpatient clinics in Europe and Canada.

Participants: 653 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Intervention: Patients randomly assigned to galantamine had their daily dose escalated over three to four weeks to maintenance doses of 24 or 32 mg.

Main outcome measures: Scores on the 11 item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input, and the disability assessment for dementia scale. The effect of apolipoprotein E4 genotype on reponse to treatment was also assessed.

Results: At six months, patients who received galantamine had a significantly better outcome on the 11 item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale than patients in the placebo group (mean treatment effect 2.9 points for lower dose and 3.1 for higher dose, intention to treat analysis, P<0.001 for both doses). Galantamine was more effective than placebo on the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input (P<0.05 for both doses v placebo). At six months, patients in the higher dose galantamine group had significantly better scores on the disability assessment for dementia scale than patients in the placebo group (mean treatment effect 3.4 points, P<0.05). Apolipoprotein E genotype had no effect on the efficacy of galantamine. 80% (525) of patients completed the study.

Conclusion: Galantamine is effective and well tolerated in Alzheimer's disease. As galantamine slowed the decline of functional ability as well as cognition, its effects are likely to be clinically relevant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Profile of trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (SE) change from baseline in score on 11 item cognitive subscale of Alzheimer's disease assessment scale over time, observed case analysis
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (SE) change in 11 item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog/11) scores at six months according to baseline score on mini-mental state examination, observed case analysis

Comment in

References

    1. Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science. 1982;217:408–414. - PubMed
    1. Allen NHP, Burns A. The treatment of Alzheimer's disease. J Psychopharmacol. 1995;9:43–56. - PubMed
    1. Nordberg A, Svensson A-L. Cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of tolerability and pharmacology. Drug Saf. 1998;19:465–480. - PubMed
    1. Schneider LS. New therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57(suppl 14):30–36. - PubMed
    1. Pryse-Phillips W. Do we have drugs for dementia? Arch Neurol. 1999;56:735–737. - PubMed

Publication types