MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach
- PMID: 11112809
- DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.6.g00nv111539
MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach
Abstract
Cervical carcinoma is the third most common gynecologic malignancy and is typically seen in younger women, often with serious consequences. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system provides worldwide epidemiologic and treatment response statistics. However, there are significant inaccuracies in the FIGO staging system, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, although not included in that system, is now widely accepted as optimal for evaluation of important prognostic factors such as lesion volume and metastatic lymph node involvement that will help determine the treatment strategy. MR imaging examination obviates the use of invasive procedures such as cystoscopy and proctoscopy, especially when there is no evidence of local extension. Brachytherapy and external beam therapy are optimized with MR imaging evaluation of the shape and direction of lesion growth. In general, T2-weighted MR imaging more clearly delineates cervical carcinoma and is preferred for evaluation of the lymph nodes. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging may help identify smaller tumors, detect or confirm invasion of adjacent organs, and identify fistulous tracts. MR imaging staging, when available, is invaluable for identifying important prognostic factors and optimizing treatment strategies.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance imaging and its value in the staging of cervical carcinoma - Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and pathological images with FIGO staging system.J BUON. 2004 Apr-Jun;9(2):127-38. J BUON. 2004. PMID: 17415805
-
Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):855-64. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181ed3090. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010. PMID: 21084900
-
The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1805-27. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125519. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 23065170 Review.
-
FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.Radiographics. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):241-54. doi: 10.1148/rg.321115045. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 22236905
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma: a pictorial review.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 Oct;52(5):427-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01999.x. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008. PMID: 19032387 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion images of gynecological malignant tumors: comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography.Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Feb;28(2):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0387-3. Epub 2010 Feb 26. Jpn J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20182843
-
Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy.Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):313-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2804-z. Epub 2005 Jun 14. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16425027
-
Common Malignancies During Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review.Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021 Jul 3;1(3):103-109. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10015. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021. PMID: 35399318 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patterns of Recurrent Disease in Cervical Cancer.J Pers Med. 2022 May 6;12(5):755. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050755. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35629178 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Size assessment of breast lesions by means of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for magnetic resonance mammography.Radiol Med. 2011 Oct;116(7):1039-49. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0664-y. Epub 2011 Mar 19. Radiol Med. 2011. PMID: 21424564 English, Italian.