Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome
- PMID: 11117766
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11652.x
Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome
Abstract
Objective: To detect differences in clinical short term outcome between total abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital of Helsingborg, Sweden.
Sample: One hundred-twenty women scheduled for hysterectomy for various indications.
Methods: Randomisation into three treatment arms: total abdominal hysterectomy (n = 40); vaginal hysterectomy (n = 40) and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 40). During traditional abdominal and vaginal surgery, laparoscopic assistance was kept to a minimum. Substantial number of cases needed volume-reducing manoeuvres due to uterine size.
Main outcome measures: Duration of surgery, anaesthesia, time in hospital and recovery time.
Results: Mean duration (range) of surgery was significantly longer for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy, 102 min (50-175), 81 min (35-135) and 68 min (28-125), respectively. Mean stay in hospital and mean time to recovery was significantly longer for total abdominal hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The difference between vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy was not significant. It was possible to remove uteri under 600 g with all three methods. Four laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomies and one vaginal hysterectomy were converted to open surgery. Reoperation and blood transfusion were required after two vaginal hysterectomies and one laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. One woman needed blood transfusion after total abdominal hysterectomy.
Conclusions: Traditional vaginal hysterectomy proved to be feasible and the faster operative technique compared with vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic assistance. The abdominal technique was somewhat faster, but time spent in theatre was not significantly shorter. Abdominal hysterectomy required on average a longer hospital stay of one day and one additional week of convalescence compared with traditional vaginal hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy should be a primary method for uterine removal.
Comment in
-
A randomised comparison and economic evaluation in laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.BJOG. 2002 Dec;109(12):1429; author reply 1429. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.1008a.x. BJOG. 2002. PMID: 12505005 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-24. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007. PMID: 17329946 Lithuanian.
-
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.J Reprod Med. 1996 Jul;41(7):497-503. J Reprod Med. 1996. PMID: 8829062
-
One-year cohort of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies: complications and subjective outcomes.J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Oct;189(4):389-96. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00170-2. J Am Coll Surg. 1999. PMID: 10509465
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.J Reprod Med. 1994 Aug;39(8):625-30. J Reprod Med. 1994. PMID: 7996527 Review.
-
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.033. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21664034 Review.
Cited by
-
Vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy in The Netherlands; A prospective cohort study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024 Jul 2;23:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100323. eCollection 2024 Sep. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024. PMID: 39091980 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4. BMC Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 31234852 Free PMC article.
-
Abdominal hysterectomy: a new approach for conventional procedure.J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Apr;8(4):OC15-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7263.4307. Epub 2014 Apr 15. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014. PMID: 24959484 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37642285 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. PMID: 26264829 Free PMC article. Updated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical