Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1613-21.
doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00771-9.

Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies

J C Roeske  1 , A Lujan, J Rotmensch, S E Waggoner, D Yamada, A J Mundt
Affiliations

Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies

J C Roeske et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the ability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to reduce the volume of small bowel irradiated in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT).

Methods and materials: Ten women with cervical (5) or endometrial (5) cancer undergoing WPRT were selected for this analysis. A planning CT scan of each patient was obtained following administration of oral, i.v., and rectal contrast. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the proximal vagina, parametrial tissues, uterus (if present), and regional lymph nodes. The CTV was expanded uniformly by 1 cm in all directions to produce a planning target volume (PTV). The bladder, rectum, and small bowel were also delineated in each patient. Two plans were created: a standard "4-field box" with apertures shaped to the PTV in each beam's eye view and an IM-WPRT plan designed to conform to the PTV while minimizing the volume of normal tissues irradiated. Both plans were normalized to deliver 45 Gy to the PTV. Isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were compared.

Results: The IM-WPRT plan reduced the volume of small bowel irradiated in all 10 patients at doses above 30 Gy. At the prescription dose, the average volume of small bowel irradiated was reduced by a factor of two (17.4 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0005). In addition, the average volume of rectum and bladder irradiated at the prescription dose was reduced by 23% in both cases (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0005, respectively). The average PTV doses delivered by the conventional and IM-WPRT plans were 47.8 Gy and 47.4 Gy, respectively. Corresponding maximum doses were 50.0 Gy and 54.8 Gy, respectively. However, on average, only 3.2% of the PTV received greater than 50.0 Gy in the IM-WPRT plans.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that IM-WPRT is an effective means of reducing the volume of small bowel irradiated in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving WPRT. This approach potentially offers a method for reducing small bowel complications in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types