Low infectious complications in segmental living related small bowel transplantation in adults
- PMID: 11127310
- DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140609.x
Low infectious complications in segmental living related small bowel transplantation in adults
Abstract
Clinical small bowel transplantation (SBTx) has been associated with a high rate of infectious complications. Laparotomy, preservation injury, abnormal motility, lymphatic disruption, aberrant systemic venous drainage, rejection and antibiotic therapy could all be implicated in the etiology of these complications. In addition to the underlying disease, total parental nutrition could determine infections and liver impairment. Recently, standardized techniques for segmental living related SBTx (LR-SBTx) have been developed. This technique allows reduction of some of these factors, thus resulting in a reduced incidence of infections. We report the infectious complications observed in 3 patients with short bowel syndrome treated with LR-SBTx at our institution. A segment of 180-200 cm of ileum was transplanted with a neglectably short cold ischemia time (CIT). The donor bowel was decontaminated. Oral tacrolimus, prednisone and IV induction with ATG were used for immunosuppression. Blood, stool, urine, sputum and peritoneal fluids were collected and cultured as a routine surveillance. All recipients are alive with a current follow-up time up to 21 months. No bacterial infections were observed during the post-transplant period. One patient developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis 4 months after LR-SBTx and was treated successfully with IV ganciclovir. In our limited experience, LR-SBTx is associated with a low infection rate. This could be due to optimal graft decontamination, short CIT and to the reduced incidence of rejection and lower immunosuppression used in this immunologically well-matched combination.
Similar articles
-
Segmental living related small bowel transplantation in adults.J Gastrointest Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;5(2):168-72; discussion 173. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80030-5. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001. PMID: 11331480
-
Small bowel transplantation using grafts from living-related donors. Two case reports.Transpl Int. 2000;13 Suppl 1:S179-84. doi: 10.1007/s001470050321. Transpl Int. 2000. PMID: 11111992
-
Progressive functional adaptation of segmental bowel graft from living related donor.Transplantation. 2001 Feb 27;71(4):569-71. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200102270-00014. Transplantation. 2001. PMID: 11258438
-
Pediatric small bowel transplantation.Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010 Feb;19(1):68-77. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.11.009. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20123276 Review.
-
Immune monitoring in small bowel transplantation.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010 Jun;15(3):349-56. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328339489c. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010. PMID: 20489630 Review.
Cited by
-
Living related segmental bowel transplantation: from experimental to standardized procedure.Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):694-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000232555.02880.84. Ann Surg. 2006. PMID: 17060761 Free PMC article.
-
The role of intestinal transplantation in the management of intestinal failure.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001 Aug;3(4):334-42. doi: 10.1007/s11894-001-0057-9. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001. PMID: 11470003 Free PMC article.
-
Improved Preservation of Rat Small Intestine Transplantation Graft by Introduction of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Secreted Fractions.Transpl Int. 2024 Jun 19;37:11336. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.11336. eCollection 2024. Transpl Int. 2024. PMID: 38962471 Free PMC article.
-
Short bowel syndrome: parenteral nutrition versus intestinal transplantation. Where are we today?Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Apr;52(4):876-92. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9416-6. Epub 2007 Feb 16. Dig Dis Sci. 2007. PMID: 17380398 Review.
-
Where are we at with short bowel syndrome and small bowel transplant.World J Transplant. 2012 Dec 24;2(6):95-103. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v2.i6.95. World J Transplant. 2012. PMID: 24175201 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical