Adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscular tension dysphonia: acoustic analysis of sustained phonation and reading
- PMID: 11130109
- DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80008-9
Adductor spasmodic dysphonia and muscular tension dysphonia: acoustic analysis of sustained phonation and reading
Abstract
Acoustic phonatory events were identified in 10 women diagnosed with adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) and compared to 5 women and 5 men diagnosed with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). The three acoustic parameters examined during sustained vowel production and reading included phonatory breaks, aperiodicity, and frequency shifts. Intra- and intermeasurer correlations showed high reliability for the measures. Findings indicated that those with ADSD produced a greater number of aberrant acoustic events than those with MTD. The results suggested that: (1) only those with ADSD show evidence of phonatory breaks during vocalization, albeit a sustained vowel or voicing during reading; (2) those with ADSD demonstrate greater variation in the type of aberrant acoustic events produced as a function of speech task. The latter point suggests that control of the larynx varies as a function of task demand, a finding not evident in the functionally based disorder of MTD. MTD is a disorder that often presents itself in a similar clinical manner to ADSD because of its perceptual commonalties and resembling laryngoscopic characteristics. The acoustic analysis presented in this study could be used as a method to assist in distinguishing between the two disorder types.
Similar articles
-
Acoustic variations in adductor spasmodic dysphonia as a function of speech task.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Feb;42(1):127-40. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4201.127. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999. PMID: 10025549
-
Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia in Mandarin-speaking Chinese.J Voice. 2019 May;33(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Feb 12. J Voice. 2019. PMID: 29449062
-
Variations in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: acoustic evidence.J Voice. 1998 Jun;12(2):214-22. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80041-6. J Voice. 1998. PMID: 9649077
-
Differential diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia and spasmodic dysphonia.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jun;18(3):165-70. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328339376c. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010. PMID: 20389245 Review.
-
Listening: the key to diagnosing spasmodic dysphonia.ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2008 Winter;26(1):8-12. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18274236 Review.
Cited by
-
Deep Learning-Based Analysis of Glottal Attack and Offset Times in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.J Voice. 2023 Nov 15:S0892-1997(23)00319-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.10.011. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2023. PMID: 37977969 Free PMC article.
-
Focal white matter changes in spasmodic dysphonia: a combined diffusion tensor imaging and neuropathological study.Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):447-59. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm303. Epub 2007 Dec 14. Brain. 2008. PMID: 18083751 Free PMC article.
-
Automated Creak Differentiates Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia and Muscle Tension Dysphonia.Laryngoscope. 2023 Oct;133(10):2687-2694. doi: 10.1002/lary.30588. Epub 2023 Jan 30. Laryngoscope. 2023. PMID: 36715109 Free PMC article.
-
Symptom Expression Across Voiced Speech Sounds in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.J Voice. 2025 Mar;39(2):567.e23-567.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Nov 21. J Voice. 2025. PMID: 36424240
-
Cortical Silent Period Reveals Differences Between Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia and Muscle Tension Dysphonia.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Mar;30(3):221-32. doi: 10.1177/1545968315591705. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016. PMID: 26089309 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical