Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):1037-57.

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening

S E Stockdale et al. Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the costs of implementing a church-based, telephone-counseling program for increasing mammography use, and to identify the components of costs and the likely cost-effectiveness in hypothetical communities with varying characteristics.

Data sources/study setting: An ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of 1,443 women recruited from 45 churches participating in the Los Angeles Mammography Promotion (LAMP) program were followed from 1995 to 1997.

Study design: Churches were stratified into blocks and randomized into three intervention arms-telephone counseling, mail counseling, and control. We surveyed participants before and after the intervention to collect data on mammography use and demographic characteristics.

Data collection/extraction methods: We used call records, activity reports, and interviews to collect data on the time and materials needed to organize and carry out the intervention. We constructed a standard model of costs and cost-effectiveness based on these data and the Year One results of the LAMP program.

Principal findings: The cost in materials and overhead to the church site was $10.89 per participant and $188 per additional screening. However, when the estimated cost for church volunteers' time was included, the cost of the intervention increased substantially.

Conclusions: A church-based program to promote the use of mammography would be feasible for many churches with the use of volunteer labor and resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):175-88 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2000 Sep;90(9):1468-71 - PubMed
    1. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):649-63 - PubMed
    1. Am J Occup Ther. 1987 May;41(5):285-91 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):431-3 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms