A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission

Abstract

Intensive, myelosuppressive therapy is necessary to maximize outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A comparison was made of 3 aggressive postremission approaches for children and adolescents with AML in a randomized trial, CCG-2891. A total of 652 children and adolescents with AML who achieved remission on 2 induction regimens using identical drugs and doses (standard and intensive timing) were eligible for allocation to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) based on matched related donor status (n = 181) or randomization to autologous BMT (n = 177) or to aggressive high-dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy (n = 179). Only 115 patients (18%) refused to participate in the postremission phase of this study. Overall compliance with the 3 allocated regimens was 90%. At 8 years actuarial, 54% +/- 4% (95% confidence interval) of all remission patients remain alive. Survival by assigned regimen ("intent to treat") is as follows: allogeneic BMT, 60% +/- 9%; autologous BMT, 48% +/- 8%; and chemotherapy, 53% +/- 8%. Survival in the allogeneic BMT group is significantly superior to autologous BMT (P =.002) and chemotherapy (P =.05); differences between chemotherapy and autologous BMT are not significant (P =.21). No potential confounding factors affected results. Patients receiving intensive-timing induction therapy had superior long-term survival irrespective of postremission regimen received (allogeneic BMT, 70% +/- 9%; autologous BMT, 54% +/- 9%; chemotherapy, 57% +/- 10%). Allogeneic BMT remains the treatment of choice for children and adolescents with AML in remission, when a matched related donor is available. For all others, there is no advantage to autologous BMT; hence, aggressive nonablative chemotherapy should be used.