Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jan;39(1):323-7.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.323-327.2001.

Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on staib agar and caffeic acid-ferric citrate agar

Affiliations

Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on staib agar and caffeic acid-ferric citrate agar

A Al Mosaid et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

The methods currently available for the identification of the pathogenic yeast Candida dubliniensis all have disadvantages in that they are time-consuming, expensive, and/or, in some cases, unreliable. In a recent study (P. Staib and J. Morschhäuser, Mycoses 42:521-524; 1999) of 14 C. dubliniensis and 11 C. albicans isolates, it was suggested that the ability of C. dubliniensis to produce rough colonies and chlamydospores (chlamydoconidia) on Staib agar (SA) provided a simple means of differentiating it from its close relative C. albicans. In the present investigation, we examined the colony morphology and chlamydospore production of 130 C. dubliniensis and 166 C. albicans isolates on SA and on the related defined medium caffeic acid-ferric citrate agar (CAF). All of the C. dubliniensis and C. albicans isolates produced chlamydospores on the control medium, i.e., rice-agar-Tween agar. However, while none of the C. albicans isolates produced chlamydospores on either SA or CAF, 85.4 and 83.8% of the C. dubliniensis isolates produced chlamydospores on SA and CAF, respectively. All of the C. albicans isolates grew as smooth, shiny colonies on SA after 48 to 72 h of incubation at 30 degrees C, while 97.7% of the C. dubliniensis isolates grew as rough colonies, many (65%) with a hyphal fringe. In contrast, 87.4% of the C. albicans and 93.8% of the C. dubliniensis isolates yielded rough colonies on CAF. Although the results of this study confirm that SA is a good medium for distinguishing between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans, we believe that discrimination between these two species is best achieved on the basis of colony morphology rather than chlamydospore production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Morphological appearance of C. dubliniensis and C. albicans colonies on SA following 72 h of incubation at 30°C. (a) Smooth, shiny colonies exhibited by C. albicans strain 132A (6). (b) Rough colonies exhibited by C. dubliniensis strain CD36 (25) displaying a hyphal fringe or halo.

References

    1. Bikandi J, San Millán R, Moragues M D, Cebas G, Clarke M, Coleman D C, Sullivan D J, Quindós G, Pontón J. Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis by indirect immunofluorescence based on differential localization of antigens on C. dubliniensis blastospores and Candida albicans germ tubes. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2428–2433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boerlin P, Boerlin-Petzold F, Durussel C, Addo M, Pagani J-L, Chave J-P, Bille J. Cluster of atypical Candida isolates in a group of human immunodeficiency virus-positive drug users. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1129–1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandt M E, Harrison L H, Pass M, Sofair A N, Huie S, Li R-K, Morrison C J, Warnock D W, Hajjeh R H. Candida dubliniensis fungemia: the first four cases in North America. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:46–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coleman D C, Sullivan D J, Bennett D E, Moran G P, Barry H J, Shanley D B. Candidiasis: the emergence of a novel species, Candida dubliniensis. AIDS. 1997;11:557–567. - PubMed
    1. Donnelly S A, Sullivan D J, Shanley D B, Coleman D C. Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences. Microbiology. 1999;145:1871–1882. - PubMed

Publication types