Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in the treatment of patients with major depression after first myocardial infarction: findings from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- PMID: 11138997
- DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200011000-00007
Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in the treatment of patients with major depression after first myocardial infarction: findings from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: Depression and hostility are significant risk factors for mortality and morbidity after myocardial infarction (MI). Much research is still needed to identify effective ways to reduce emotional distress in patients with cardiovascular disease. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of the antidepressant fluoxetine in patients with depression after their first MI.
Methods: Fifty-four patients with major depression after MI were randomly assigned to receive a flexible-dose regimen of fluoxetine or placebo for the first 9 weeks of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients without serious adverse effects who wished to continue participating in the study were given fluoxetine or placebo for an additional 16 weeks. To evaluate the efficacy of fluoxetine, the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the Hostility Scale of the 90-item Symptom Check List (SCL-90) were used as primary measures of outcome. To evaluate the safety of fluoxetine, cardiac function was measured before and after treatment with echocardiography and electrocardiography.
Results: The a priori difference in antidepressive efficacy (4-point difference in HAMD-17 scores between the fluoxetine and placebo groups) was not met. However, the response rate among patients receiving fluoxetine was significantly greater than that among patients receiving placebo at week 25 (48 vs. 26%, p = .05). Among patients with mild depression (HAMD-17 score < or =21), HAMD-17 scores were significantly different (p < .05) between the fluoxetine and placebo groups at weeks 9 (by 5.4 points) and 25 (by 5.8 points). Also, hostility scores at week 25 were significantly reduced among patients receiving fluoxetine (p = .02). Analysis of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters revealed no decrease in cardiac function as a result of treatment with fluoxetine.
Conclusions: Although the overall difference between the fluoxetine and placebo groups was not significant, there was a trend favoring fluoxetine in this relatively small sample. The response rate in the group receiving fluoxetine was comparable with that observed in other studies of patients with cardiovascular disease. In addition, fluoxetine seemed to be particularly effective in patients with mild depression and was associated with a statistically significant reduction in hostility. The results of this study suggest that fluoxetine can be safely used to treat patients with post-MI depression beginning 3 months after the event.
Similar articles
-
A Double-blind, randomized trial of St John's wort, fluoxetine, and placebo in major depressive disorder.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Oct;25(5):441-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000178416.60426.29. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16160619 Clinical Trial.
-
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15589385 Clinical Trial.
-
Preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of tryptophan combined with fluoxetine to treat major depressive disorder: antidepressant and hypnotic effects.J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000 Sep;25(4):337-46. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000. PMID: 11022398 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
Fluoxetine--do the benefits outweigh the risks in adolescent major depression?Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005 Jan;6(1):147-50. doi: 10.1517/14656566.6.1.147. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005. PMID: 15709892 Review.
Cited by
-
Longitudinal trends in the prevalence and treatment of depression among adults with cardiovascular disease: An analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey 2009-2020.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 8;13:943165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.943165. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36159924 Free PMC article.
-
Depression and ischemic heart disease: overview of the evidence and treatment implications.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003 May;5(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s11920-003-0009-1. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003. PMID: 12686002 Review.
-
Evaluation of rosmarinic acid against myocardial infarction in maternally separated rats.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;395(10):1189-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00210-022-02273-9. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35876905
-
Depression treatment in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(5):PCC.13r01509. doi: 10.4088/PCC.13r01509. Epub 2013 Oct 24. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013. PMID: 24511449 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of sertraline for depression in patients with CHF (SADHART-CHF): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline for major depression with congestive heart failure.Am Heart J. 2008 Sep;156(3):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jul 7. Am Heart J. 2008. PMID: 18760123 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous