[Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients]
- PMID: 11139710
[Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients]
Abstract
We retrospectively studied 77 laparoscopic sacral colpopexies performed from June 1996 to May 1998. Suspension was reinforced with two strips of synthetic mesh. Five patients had previously undergone hysterectomy and 4 others had experienced failure of surgery for prolapse of the uterus. Laparoscopy was performed in 83 women with symptomatic prolapse of the uterus. Six cases required conversion to laparotomy because of technical difficulties. All other 77 patients underwent laparoscopic sacropexy using anterior and posterior mesh reinforcement. Subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated in 60 cases, laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in 74 and levator myorraphy using the vaginal approach in 55. Operative time decreased from 292 to 180 minutes as the surgeon gained experience. The main operative complications were one rectal and two bladder injuries. Three patients required reoperations for haematoma or hemorrhage. One patient complained of chronic inflammation of the cervix and another experienced rejection of the posterior mesh 6 months after the operation. Mean follow up was 343 days. Three other patients required reoperation: one for a 3(rd) degree cystocele and two for recurrent stress incontinence. The conclusion of this study is that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is feasible. Operative time and postoperative complications are related to the surgeon's experience but remain comparable to those noted in laparotomy. Long term assessment is required to confirm the results of this procedure.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures.JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):115-9. JSLS. 2002. PMID: 12113413 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.006. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18312989
-
Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.005. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17848318
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
Surgical management of uterine prolapse.Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):493-507. Minerva Ginecol. 2008. PMID: 18981977 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a minimum of three years follow-up.J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):175-80. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0244-0. Epub 2011 Jan 19. J Robot Surg. 2011. PMID: 27637704
-
Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology.World J Urol. 2006 Jun;24(2):188-92. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0071-5. Epub 2006 Mar 24. World J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16557388
-
Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s).Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Mar;26(3):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2514-7. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25323309
-
[Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?].Urologe A. 2009 Sep;48(9):1038-43. doi: 10.1007/s00120-009-2080-7. Urologe A. 2009. PMID: 19669726 Review. German.
-
Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):113-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1845-5. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22717784
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous