Assessing Medicaid recipient access and satisfaction. Fee-for-service, case management, and capitation

Abstract

Medicaid increasingly requires enrollment in managed care programs. This study assessed access to care, satisfaction with care, and appointment wait times during the transition from fee for service to managed care using three annual Medicaid recipient surveys. There was little evidence of dissatisfaction or poorer access among managed care recipients. Fee-for-service recipients, compared to primary care case management, reported greater general (91 vs. 78%, p < .01) and specialty care access (92 vs. 80%, p < .01). When appointments were required, adult HMO enrollees, compared to case management, had longer waits for routine care in the second (5.8 +/- 8.2 days vs. 4.0 +/- 6.6) and third surveys (5.5 +/- 6.9 days vs. 3.8 +/- 7.3); waits for other appointments did not consistently differ by program. There were no significant program differences in overall satisfaction. Findings are tempered by the potential for response bias and geographic confounding. Continued monitoring is crucial to assure that access and satisfaction remain high in Medicaid managed care.