Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2001 Jan 6;322(7277):11-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7277.11.

Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

M F Muldoon et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between cholesterol lowering interventions and risk of death from suicide, accident, or trauma (non-illness mortality).

Design: Meta-analysis of the non-illness mortality outcomes of large, randomised clinical trials of cholesterol lowering treatments.

Studies reviewed: 19 out of 21 eligible trials that had data available on non-illness mortality. INTERVENTIONS REVIEWED: Dietary modification, drug treatment, or partial ileal bypass surgery for 1-10 years.

Main outcome measure: Deaths from suicides, accidents, and violence in treatment groups compared with control groups.

Results: Across all trials, the odds ratio of non-illness mortality in the treated groups, relative to control groups, was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.52; P=0.20). The odds ratios were 1.28 (0.94 to 1.74; P=0.12) for primary prevention trials and 1.00 (0.65 to 1.55; P=0.98) for secondary prevention trials. Randomised clinical trials using statins did not show a treatment related rise in non-illness mortality (0.84, 0.50 to 1.41; P=0.50), whereas a trend toward increased deaths from suicide and violence was observed in trials of dietary interventions and non-statin drugs (1.32, 0.98 to 1.77; P=0.06). No relation was found between the magnitude of cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality (P=0.23).

Conclusion: Currently available evidence does not indicate that non-illness mortality is increased significantly by cholesterol lowering treatments. A modest increase may occur with dietary interventions and non-statin drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of non-illness mortality in treated groups, relative to controls, in randomised clinical trials of cholesterol reduction. Statins were used in two primary prevention and four secondary prevention trials

References

    1. Hunninghake DB, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, Harris WS, Feldman FB, Miller VT, et al. The efficacy of intensive dietary therapy alone or combined with lovastatin in outpatients with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1213–1219. - PubMed
    1. Tang JL, Armitage JM, Silagy CA, Fowler GH, Neil HAW. Systematic review of dietary intervention trials to lower blood total cholesterol in free-living subjects. BMJ. 1998;316:1213–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baxter C, Jones R, Corr L. Time trend analysis and variations in prescribing lipid lowering drugs in general practice. BMJ. 1998;317:1134–1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muldoon MF, Manuck SM, Matthews KM. Lowering cholesterol concentrations and mortality: a quantitative review of primary prevention trials. BMJ. 1990;301:309–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davey Smith G, Pekkanen J. Should there be a moratorium on the use of cholesterol lowering drugs? BMJ. 1992;304:341–348. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances