Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Dec;4(4):635-43.
doi: 10.1023/a:1026582002762.

Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

R F Coyne et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Although recent studies have demonstrated that the endpoint of isthmus conduction block is superior to that of termination and subsequent inability to induce atrial flutter (AFl), the optimal method for determining isthmus conduction block has not been determined. Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during coronary sinus (CS) pacing may provide a reliable endpoint for AFl ablation.

Methods and results: Catheter mapping and ablation was performed in 42 patients with isthmus-dependent AFl. The patients were divided into two groups, based on procedural endpoint: Group I (28 patients) - isthmus conduction block was determined based on multipolar catheter recordings and electroanatomic mapping, and Group II (14 patients) - isthmus conduction block was determined by electroanatomic mapping during CS pacing alone. In Group I, ablation procedures were acutely successful in 25 of 28 patients (89 %). A 100 % concordance between the data presented by multipolar catheter recordings and electroanatomic mapping was noted in determining the presence or absence of isthmus conduction block. In Group II, ablation procedures were acutely successful in 13 of 14 patients, 13 (93 %). After a mean of 16.3+/-3.7 months follow up, there was 1 atrial flutter recurrence in the 38 patients (2.6 %) with demonstrated isthmus block at the end of the procedure.

Conclusions: Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during CS pacing is comparable to the multipolar catheter mapping technique for assessing isthmus conduction block as an endpoint for AFl ablation procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jun 1;57(15):1309-14 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Mar 15;71(8):705-9 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jul;21(7):1448-56 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1996 Dec 15;94(12):3204-13 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):407-24 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources