Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements
- PMID: 11142606
Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements
Abstract
Background: The methods used in epidemiological studies to assess exposure are often affected by a conspicuous amount of measurement error. Exposure-measurement error is recognised to cause attenuation in the association between exposure and disease. Among different possible approaches, the validity coefficient of a measurement can be estimated by a comparison of three types of measurements, using either structural equation models or factor analysis (the triads method). These approaches assume that the measurements are linearly related to true intake and have independent random errors.
Methods: In this paper we present an estimator of the variance of the estimated validity coefficient to compute the associated confidence intervals. Standard error for the validity coefficient allows the efficiency of validation studies to be evaluated. Our work was motivated by the fact that existing software does not provide correct standard errors for the estimated validity coefficient. The approach is illustrated using selected examples from dietary validation studies.
Results: The accuracy of our formula is evaluated by comparison with the results of a simulation study, which shows that our variance estimator provides good results for sample sizes of at least n = 100 and when the expected value of the validity coefficient is not too close to 1.0, independent of the sample size. Our estimator formula performs better than either a naïve approach, that computes the standard error for a validity coefficient as if it is a straightforward correlation coefficient, or the SAS-CALIS procedure, which uses a maximum likelihood method.
Conclusions: In evaluating the validity of the type of measurement chosen to assess exposure in an epidemiological study, it is important to provide an estimate of the precision of the validity coefficient of the measurement. Our variance estimator may help calculate sample size requirements for validation studies.
Similar articles
-
Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire assessment of carotenoid and vitamin E intake using weighed food records and plasma biomarkers: the method of triads model.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;59(2):211-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602060. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005. PMID: 15483635
-
Validation studies in epidemiology: the relative precision of different designs.J Epidemiol Biostat. 2000;5(6):331-7. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2000. PMID: 11234737
-
Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.AANA J. 1996 Jun;64(3):261-8. AANA J. 1996. PMID: 9095698 Review.
-
Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct 15;160(8):814-22. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh280. Am J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15466504
-
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007. PMID: 17944619 Review.
Cited by
-
Does adjustment for non-differential misclassification of dichotomous exposure induce positive bias if there is no true association?Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 3;7:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100132. eCollection 2024 Jun. Glob Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 38152554 Free PMC article.
-
Does recall bias explain the association of mood disorders with workplace harassment?Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 28;7:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100144. eCollection 2024 Jun. Glob Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38711843 Free PMC article.
-
Demographic-specific Validity of the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Sedentary Time Survey.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jan;51(1):41-48. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001743. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. PMID: 30095743 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of a web-based food record tool and a food-frequency questionnaire and objective validation using the doubly labelled water technique in a Swedish middle-aged population.J Nutr Sci. 2016 Oct 3;5:e39. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.29. eCollection 2016. J Nutr Sci. 2016. PMID: 27752306 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of practices of handling exposure measurement errors in modern epidemiology: are the best practices in statistics being adopted by epidemiologists?BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02651-w. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025. PMID: 40855410 Free PMC article.