The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database
- PMID: 11145306
- DOI: 10.1080/10408440008951123
The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database
Abstract
The comet assay is a microgel electrophoresis technique for detecting DNA damage at the level of the single cell. When this technique is applied to detect genotoxicity in experimental animals, the most important advantage is that DNA lesions can be measured in any organ, regardless of the extent of mitotic activity. The purpose of this article is to summarize the in vivo genotoxicity in eight organs of the mouse of 208 chemicals selected from International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Groups 1, 2A, 2B, 3, and 4, and from the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) Carcinogenicity Database, and to discuss the utility of the comet assay in genetic toxicology. Alkylating agents, amides, aromatic amines, azo compounds, cyclic nitro compounds, hydrazines, halides having reactive halogens, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were chemicals showing high positive effects in this assay. The responses detected reflected the ability of this assay to detect the fragmentation of DNA molecules produced by DNA single strand breaks induced chemically and those derived from alkali-labile sites developed from alkylated bases and bulky base adducts. The mouse or rat organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Therefore, organ-specific genotoxicity was necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. It would be expected that DNA crosslinkers would be difficult to detect by this assay, because of the resulting inhibition of DNA unwinding. The proportion of 10 DNA crosslinkers that was positive, however, was high in the gastrointestinal mucosa, stomach, and colon, but less than 50% in the liver and lung. It was interesting that the genotoxicity of DNA crosslinkers could be detected in the gastrointestinal organs even though the agents were administered intraperitoneally. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative nongenotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The Ames test is generally used as a first screening method to assess chemical genotoxicity and has provided extensive information on DNA reactivity. Out of 208 chemicals studied, 117 are Ames test-positive rodent carcinogens, 43 are Ames test-negative rodent carcinogens, and 30 are rodent noncarcinogens (which include both Ames test-positive and negative noncarcinogens). High positive response ratio (110/117) for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio (6/30) for rodent noncarcinogens were shown in the comet assay. For Ames test-negative rodent carcinogens, less than 50% were positive in the comet assay, suggesting that the assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying nongenotoxic carcinogens. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. This assay had a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic noncarcinogens, suggesting that the comet assay can be used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of in vitro genotoxic chemicals. For chemicals whose in vivo genotoxicity has been tested in multiple organs by the comet assay, published data are summarized with unpublished data and compared with relevant genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data. Because it is clear that no single test is capable of detecting all relevant genotoxic agents, the usual approach should be to carry out a battery of in vitro and in vivo tests for genotoxicity. The conventional micronucleus test in the hematopoietic system is a simple method to assess in vivo clastogenicity of chemicals. Its performance is related to whether a chemical reaches the hematopoietic system. Among 208 chemicals studied (including 165 rodent carcinogens), 54 rodents carcinogens do not induce micronuclei in mouse hematopoietic system despite the positive finding with one or two in vitro tests. Forty-nine of 54 rodent carcinogens that do not induce micronuclei were positive in the comet assay, suggesting that the comet assay can be used as a further in vivo test apart from the cytogenetic assays in hematopoietic cells. In this review, we provide one recommendation for the in vivo comet assay protocol based on our own data.
Similar articles
-
The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.Mutat Res. 1999 Mar 15;440(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00006-6. Mutat Res. 1999. PMID: 10095124
-
The alkaline single cell electrophoresis assay with eight mouse organs: results with 22 mono-functional alkylating agents (including 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines) and 10 DNA crosslinkers.Mutat Res. 2000 Apr 13;467(1):83-98. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00014-0. Mutat Res. 2000. PMID: 10771273
-
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.Mutat Res. 2005 Jul 4;584(1-2):1-256. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15979392
-
Combinations of genotoxic tests for the evaluation of group 1 IARC carcinogens.J Appl Toxicol. 2018 Jan;38(1):81-99. doi: 10.1002/jat.3496. Epub 2017 Jul 11. J Appl Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 28695982 Review.
-
Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23954551 Review.
Cited by
-
Metabolic toxicity screening using electrochemiluminescence arrays coupled with enzyme-DNA biocolloid reactors and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2012;5(1):79-105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.111808.073659. Epub 2012 Apr 5. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2012. PMID: 22482786 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence of Some Natural Products with Antigenotoxic Effects. Part 2: Plants, Vegetables, and Natural Resin.Nutrients. 2018 Dec 10;10(12):1954. doi: 10.3390/nu10121954. Nutrients. 2018. PMID: 30544726 Free PMC article. Review.
-
State-of-the-Art Metabolic Toxicity Screening and Pathway Evaluation.Anal Chem. 2016 May 3;88(9):4584-99. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04772. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Anal Chem. 2016. PMID: 27043322 Free PMC article.
-
Novel In Vivo CometChip Reveals NDMA-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Multiple Mouse Tissues.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 4;23(19):11776. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911776. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36233095 Free PMC article.
-
1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 prevents DNA damage and restores antioxidant enzymes in rat hepatocarcinogenesis induced by diethylnitrosamine and promoted by phenobarbital.World J Gastroenterol. 2004 May 1;10(9):1268-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i9.1268. World J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15112340 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources