Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Jan;14(1):1-14.
doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.1.1-14.2001.

Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation

Affiliations
Review

Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation

R S Boneva et al. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

Xenotransplantation, the transplantation of living organs, tissues, or cells from one species to another, is viewed as a potential solution to the existing shortage of human organs for transplantation. While whole-organ xenotransplantation is still in the preclinical stage, cellular xenotransplantation and extracorporeal perfusion applications are showing promise in early clinical trials. Advances in immunosuppressive therapy, gene engineering, and cloning of animals bring a broader array of xenotransplantation protocols closer to clinical trials. Despite several potential advantages over allotransplantation, xenotransplantation encompasses a number of problems. Immunologic rejection remains the primary hindrance. The potential to introduce infections across species barriers, another major concern, is the main focus of this review. Nonhuman primates are unlikely to be a main source for xenotransplantation products despite their phylogenetic proximity to humans. Genetically engineered pigs, bred under special conditions, are currently envisaged as the major source. Thus far, there has been no evidence for human infections caused by pig xenotransplantation products. However, the existence of xenotropic endogenous retroviruses and the clinical evidence of long-lasting porcine cell microchimerism indicate the potential for xenogeneic infections. Thus, further trials should continue under regulatory oversight, with close clinical and laboratory monitoring for potential xenogeneic infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reference deleted.
    1. Achong B G, Mansell P W A, Ebstein M A, Cliford P. An unusual virus in cultures from a human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971;46:299–307. - PubMed
    1. Akiyoshi D E, Denaro M, Zhu H, Greenstain J L, Banerjee P, Fishman J A. Identification of a full length cDNA for an endogenous retrovirus of miniature swine. J Virol. 1998;72:4503–4507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allan J S. The risk of using baboons as transplant donors: exogenous and endogenous viruses. Ann N Y Acad Sci Xenotransplant. 1998;862:87–99. - PubMed
    1. Allan J S, Broussard S R, Michaels M G, Starzl T E, Leighton K L, Whitehead E M, Comuzzie A G, Lanford R E, Leland M M, Switzer W M, Heneine W. Amplification of simian retroviral sequences from human recipients of baboon liver transplants. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1998;14:821–824. - PMC - PubMed