Assessment of cognitive coping styles: a closer look at situation-response inventories

Abstract

Cognitive coping style approaches establish two concepts central to the understanding of people's responses to a stressful situation: "attention" and "avoidance". Theoretical frameworks corresponding to these conceptions are Sensitization-Repression (Byrne, 1961), Monitoring-Blunting (Miller, 1980), and Vigilance-Cognitive Avoidance (Krohne, 1986). Such types of cognitive coping styles are usually measured by means of situation-response inventories. In the present article, we take a closer look at this kind of coping assessment by considering the scenarios, the coping options and response formats, the dimensionality of the constructs, and published data on the reliability and the validity of seven situation-response inventories. Three important points deserve to be highlighted: (a) it probably makes little sense to assess coping style using scenarios that diverge maximally with respect to controllability and predictability since coping is not assumed to show such complete cross-situational stability; (b) similarly named inventories rely on largely different operationalizations and can hardly be considered as measuring similar constructs; and (c) monitoring/vigilance and blunting/avoidance generally emerge as independent constructs, which argues against use of summary scores.