Integrity and research: introducing the concept of dual blindness. how blind are double-blind clinical trials in alternative medicine?
- PMID: 11152053
- DOI: 10.1089/acm.2000.6.493
Integrity and research: introducing the concept of dual blindness. how blind are double-blind clinical trials in alternative medicine?
Abstract
Double-blind methodology is used in clinical studies to control for potential external or nonspecific influences such as belief and expectation, as well as to maintain as much objectivity as possible on the part of the researchers. Despite not being feasible in all medical disciplines, as in the case of some modalities of complementary and alternative medicine, there are numerous studies that spuriously claim its use. Distinctions and standards therefore need to be set to avoid misleading information. We propose a new term in research methodology, dual-blind, to describe a methodological alternative in which the caregiver is not blind but the patient and an external evaluator/investigator are. The term double-blind should be used strictly to describe a methodology in which both the patient and the caregiver are blind. Making the distinction between these two terms will result in more reliable reports of clinical trials and will support integrity in research.
Similar articles
-
Behavioral research and the double-blind placebo-controlled methodology: challenges in applying the biomedical standard to behavioral headache research.Headache. 2005 May;45(5):479-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05099.x. Headache. 2005. PMID: 15953264 Review.
-
Randomized and double-blind studies--demands and reality as demonstrated by two examples of mistletoe research.Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Aug;11 Suppl 1:18-22. doi: 10.1159/000080571. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004. PMID: 15353898
-
Implications of the 'placebo effect' for CAM research.Complement Ther Med. 2013 Apr;21(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Jan 18. Complement Ther Med. 2013. PMID: 23497816
-
The blind spot in the nicotine replacement therapy literature: assessment of the double-blind in clinical trials.Addict Behav. 2004 Jun;29(4):673-84. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.010. Addict Behav. 2004. PMID: 15135549 Review.
-
Blinding and the tapestry of trial design: revealing the weaving and the woven.J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Dec;6(6):475-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2000.6.475. J Altern Complement Med. 2000. PMID: 11152048 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 35941533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? A systematic review.BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005 Jun 2;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-5-11. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005. PMID: 15932647 Free PMC article.
-
External bioenergy-induced increases in intracellular free calcium concentrations are mediated by Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and L-type calcium channel.Mol Cell Biochem. 2005 Mar;271(1-2):51-9. doi: 10.1007/s11010-005-3615-x. Mol Cell Biochem. 2005. PMID: 15881655
-
Osteopathic intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 9;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-129. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. PMID: 23570655 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-epidemiologic review: blinding and sham treatment in clinical trial design for osteopathic manipulative treatment research.Int J Osteopath Med. 2024 Mar;51:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100705. Epub 2023 Dec 14. Int J Osteopath Med. 2024. PMID: 38312536 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical