Chromatin packaging as an indicator of human sperm dysfunction
- PMID: 11155324
- PMCID: PMC3455265
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1009493824953
Chromatin packaging as an indicator of human sperm dysfunction
Abstract
Purpose: Understanding the causes of fertilization failure is an important research field in assisted reproductive programs. The present study aimed to evaluated the possible relationship between chromatin packaging quality (CMA3 staining) and (i) normal morphology and (ii) its ability to predict the functional integrity of spermatozoa in both in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment programs.
Methods: Semen of 140 men from IVF and ICSI couples were analyzed for sperm concentration, motility, morphology, and chromatin packaging (CMA3). For CMA3 classification, two cutoff values were used, namely, 44.5% +/- 13 and 1 SD above the mean, i.e., 57.5% (rounded off to 60%). IVF and ICSI data were stratified using three basic cutoff values for CMA3 staining, namely, < 44%, > 44-60%, and > 60%.
Results: Based on CMA3 results patients were divided into four groups, namely, group A, < 44% CMA3 (n = 15, IVF); group B, > or = 44% and < 60% CMA3 (n = 39, IVF); group C, > or = 60% CMA3 (n = 45 IVF); and group D, > or = 60% CMA3 (n = 41 ICSI). During receiver operator characteristic analyses the estimated cutoff value for CMA3 staining, to distinguish between < 4% and > or = 4% morphology groups, was 60%. The area under the curve was 0.89, sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 100%. When IVF rates of > 60% and < 60% were used, the optimal CMA3 value for prediction of fertilization success again was recorded at 60%. The area under the curve was 0.76, sensitivity of 81.5%, and specificity of 63.6%.
Conclusions: Chromatin packaging assessments should be included as a complementary assay to the sequential diagnostic approach of the male-factor patients.
Similar articles
-
Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates.Hum Reprod. 2000 Mar;15(3):657-61. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.657. Hum Reprod. 2000. PMID: 10686215
-
Normal sperm morphology and chromatin packaging: comparison between aniline blue and chromomycin A3 staining.Andrologia. 1999 Dec;31(6):361-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.1999.00290.x. Andrologia. 1999. PMID: 10643511
-
Defective sperm decondensation: a cause for fertilization failure.Andrologia. 2002 Feb;34(1):1-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0303-4569.2001.00423.x. Andrologia. 2002. PMID: 11996176
-
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17904130 Review.
-
Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: effect on fertilization and embryo development.Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13 Suppl 4:11-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_4.11. Hum Reprod. 1998. PMID: 10091054 Review.
Cited by
-
Cytogenetic analysis of sperm nucleous components of iranian normal and sub-fertile individuals using zona free hamster oocytes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004 Nov;21(11):409-14. doi: 10.1007/s10815-004-7529-4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004. PMID: 15672954 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of ambient air pollution on sperm quality.Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):203-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901022. Environ Health Perspect. 2010. PMID: 20123611 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of sperm chromatin evaluation on fertilization rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Nov 29;3:229. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.145719. eCollection 2014. Adv Biomed Res. 2014. PMID: 25538915 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of chromatin maturity in human spermatozoa: useful aniline blue assay for routine diagnosis of male infertility.Adv Urol. 2013;2013:578631. doi: 10.1155/2013/578631. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Adv Urol. 2013. PMID: 24198830 Free PMC article.
-
Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro.PLoS One. 2009 Jul 31;4(7):e6446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006446. PLoS One. 2009. PMID: 19649291 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A, Devroey P. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1061–1066. - PubMed
-
- Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, Smith K. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1118–1123. - PubMed
-
- Nagy ZP, Lui J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epdidymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1995;808-815 - PubMed
-
- Silber SJ, Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Devroey P. High fertilization and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicle biopsy. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:148–152. - PubMed
-
- Silber SJ, Nagy Z, Liu J, Tournaye H, Lissens W, Ferec C, Liebaers I, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. The use of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: The genetic implications for male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2031–2043. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources