Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Feb;60(2):112-5.
doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.112.

UVA-1 cold light treatment of SLE: a double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

UVA-1 cold light treatment of SLE: a double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial

M C Polderman et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often implies strong drugs with possibly serious side effects. Thus there is a need for new immunosuppressive treatments. Long wave ultraviolet A (UVA-1) cold light therapy is an anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory treatment with a possible systemic effect and few side effects. In the current study low dose UVA-1 cold light treatment was tested to determine whether it reduces disease activity in SLE.

Methods: Eleven patients with SLE were treated with UVA-1 cold light treatment and a placebo light treatment in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. In two consecutive 12 week periods the patients were treated in the first three weeks with UVA-1 and placebo treatment or vice versa. The primary variables were the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and SLE Activity Measure (SLAM).

Results: The mean SLAM and SLEDAI showed a significant decrease of 30.4% (p=0.0005) and 37.9% (p=0.016) respectively after three weeks of UVA-1 and a non-significant decline of 9.3% (p=0.43) and 12.2% (p=0.54) respectively after three weeks of placebo treatment. In this small trial the difference in reduction of the disease activity indices during UVA-1 compared with during placebo treatment failed to reach the conventional border of significance (p=0.07). The total score of quality of life measure RAND-36 did not improve significantly, but the subscore for vitality did improve.

Conclusion: Low dose UVA-1 cold light treatment was strongly suggestive of lowering disease activity in this double blind placebo controlled study, and no side effects occurred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SLAM and SLEDAI showed statistically significant improvement during UVA-1. Improvement of these variables during placebo treatment was not statistically significant.

References

    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 May;30(5):557-61 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Sep;32(9):1107-18 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jun;35(6):630-40 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1993 Jan 1;53(1):53-60 - PubMed

Publication types