Helping people with severe mental illness to obtain work: systematic review
- PMID: 11159616
- PMCID: PMC26585
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.204
Helping people with severe mental illness to obtain work: systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To determine the most effective way of helping people with severe mental illness to obtain competitive employment-that is, a job paid at the market rate, and for which anyone can apply.
Design: Systematic review.
Participants: Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials comparing prevocational training or supported employment (for people with severe mental illness) with each other or with standard community care.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome was number of subjects in competitive employment. Secondary outcomes were other employment outcomes, clinical outcomes, and costs.
Results: Eleven trials met the inclusion criteria. Five (1204 subjects) compared prevocational training with standard community care, one (256 subjects) compared supported employment with standard community care, and five (484 subjects) compared supported employment with prevocational training. Subjects in supported employment were more likely to be in competitive employment than those who received prevocational training at 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months (for example, 34% v 12% at 12 months; number needed to treat 4.45, 95% confidence interval 3.37 to 6.59). This effect was still present, although at a reduced level, after a sensitivity analysis that retained only the highest quality trials (31% v 12%; 5.3, 3.6 to 10.4). People in supported employment earned more and worked more hours per month than those who had had prevocational training.
Conclusion: Supported employment is more effective than prevocational training at helping people with severe mental illness obtain competitive employment.
Figures
References
-
- Lehman AF. Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21:645–656. - PubMed
-
- Ridgeway P, Rapp C. The active ingredients in achieving competitive employment for people with psychiatric disabilities: a research synthesis. Lawrence, KS: Commission on Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities; 1998. . (Critical Ingredients series.)
-
- Meltzer H, Gill B, Petticrew M, Hinds K. Economic activity and social functioning of adults with psychiatric disorders. London: HMSO; 1995. . (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Surveys of psychiatric morbidity in Great Britain report 2.)
-
- McCreadie RG. The Nithsdale schizophrenia surveys. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992;27:40–45. - PubMed
-
- Shepherd G, Murray A, Muijen M. Relative values: the different views of users, family carers and professionals on services for people with schizophrenia. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 1994.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous