Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Feb;58(2):179-85.
doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00247-4.

A Monte Carlo approach for small electron beam dosimetry

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Monte Carlo approach for small electron beam dosimetry

M Rincón et al. Radiother Oncol. 2001 Feb.

Abstract

Background and purpose: In treatments where it is necessary to conform the field shape yielding a very small effective beam area, dosimetry and conventional treatment planning may be inaccurate. The Monte Carlo (MC) method can be an alternative to verify dose calculations. A conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues lymphoma is presented, to show the importance of an independent assessment in critical situations.

Materials and methods: In this work, the MC technique has been employed using the program BEAM (based on EGS4 code). Electron beam simulation has been performed and the results have been compared with those obtained with films. The patient dose distribution has been obtained by two methods: the full Monte Carlo (FMC) simulation and a conventional planning system (PLATO).

Results: Concerning dosimetry, some differences have been observed in the comparison of profiles obtained with film and those obtained with the MC method. Moreover, significant differences were found in the patient isodose distribution between both calculation methods.

Conclusions: The results highlight that, in treatments where small beams are needed, conventional dosimetry and planning systems have some limitations. Therefore, an independent and more accurate assessment, such as MC, would be desirable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources