Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Feb;11(1):59-65.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001059.x.

Strength and marginal fit of full and partial porcelain crowns on Brånemark implants

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Strength and marginal fit of full and partial porcelain crowns on Brånemark implants

S Kersten et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate strength and marginal fit of different designed single crowns screwed on titanium implants (Brånemark) without the usage of any abutment. Seven test groups with 10 specimens each (standardized maxillary central incisor crowns) were fabricated of Empress (staining/veneering technique), metal-based Empress (staining/veneering technique), metal-based In-Ceram and metal ceramic (with/without cervical porcelain margin). The marginal fit of 5 specimens of each group was evaluated (SEM-Analysis) and the crowns were incisally loaded at a 30 degrees angle in a Zwick testing machine until fracture. The 5 remaining specimens underwent a marginal evaluation (SEM-analyses) before and after thermo-mechanical stressing (tms) and were loaded in the Zwick testing machine as well. All Empress ceramic crowns without metal reinforcement fractured during fixing procedure on the implant (32 N cm). The gap medians of the fixed crowns ranged from 11 microns (metal ceramic crowns) to 34 microns (metal ceramic crowns with porcelain margin). No significant differences in gap width were observed before and after tms. In the strength analyses screw-binding forces (SBF) of about 135 N were registered in all test groups. Fracture failure forces (FFF) reached up to 280 N. The indication of the crown designs presented in this study is limited in clinical use because of low stability and esthetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources