Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jan;13(1):152-7.
doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200101)13:1<152::aid-jmri1023>3.0.co;2-c.

Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety

Affiliations

Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety

F G Shellock. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

This investigation evaluated metallic surgical instruments for magnetic resonance (MR) safety in association with a 1.5-Tesla/64-MHz MR system. Seven different instruments (mallet, bone punch, curette, Weil-Blakesley ethmoid forceps, suction cannula, septum speculum, and Kocher-Langenbeck retractor; Aesculap, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) were tested for magnetic field interactions, heating, and generation of artifacts by using previously described techniques. Heating was evaluated for the septum speculum and Kocher-Langenbeck retractor by using a special gel-filled phantom and a fluoroptic thermometer to record temperatures immediately before and during MRI performed at a whole-body averaged SAR of 1.3 W/kg. Artifacts were assessed with the instruments placed inside of a gel-filled phantom and performing MRI using T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo pulse sequences. Magnetic field interactions were relatively minor (deflection angles, 0 to 7 degrees; torque, 0 to +1), the highest temperature changes were < or = +0.8 degrees C, and the artifacts should not create substantial problems considering the "intended use" for these instruments. The findings of the MR safety tests indicated that the seven different metallic surgical instruments (Aesculap, Inc.) would be safe and acceptable for use in interventional MRI procedures performed with MR systems with static magnetic fields of 1.5 T or less. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:152-157.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources