Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Feb;75(2):324-31.
doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01701-5.

A randomized prospective assessor-blind evaluation of luteinizing hormone dosage and in vitro fertilization outcome

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

A randomized prospective assessor-blind evaluation of luteinizing hormone dosage and in vitro fertilization outcome

U D Gordon et al. Fertil Steril. 2001 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of exogenous LH dosage on IVF outcome.

Design: Single-blinded (assessor-blinded) study with random assignment of treatment groups.

Setting: Human Assisted Reproduction Unit, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Patient(s): Infertile normogonadotropic women undergoing their first cycle of IVF were studied.

Intervention(s): Patients were randomized to gonadotropin drugs with varying doses of LH per ampule: recombinant FSH containing no LH (group 0, n = 39), urinary FSH containing <1 IU of LH per ampule (group 1, n = 30), hMG containing 25 IU of LH per ampule (group 25, n = 30), and hMG containing 75 IU of LH per ampule (group 75, n = 29). The FSH dose was kept constant at 75 IU per ampule. A long-protocol GnRH-analog regimen was used.

Main outcome measure(s): Dose and duration of gonadotropin stimulation, follicle and oocyte numbers, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate.

Result(s): The median duration of ovarian stimulation; median number of gonadotropin ampules used; serum E2 levels; and numbers of follicles, oocytes, and embryos were similar among the four groups. Median LH levels on the day of hCG administration, however, differed significantly. Live birth rates per cycle differed markedly, but statistical significance was not achieved (23%, 7%, 20%, and 31% for groups 0, 1, 25, and 75, respectively). A significant trend in implantation rates was noted with increasing LH dosage of the urinary preparations (19%, 10%, 18%, and 28% for groups 0, 1, 25, and 75, respectively).

Conclusion(s): In the present study, although the residual endogenous LH after down-regulation was adequate for ovarian response and E2 synthesis, the addition of exogenous LH improved implantation. An FSH/LH ratio of 75/75 IU per ampule appeared to be the optimum dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources