Clinical outcome of patients with and without renal impairment undergoing a minimally invasive LIMA-to-LAD bypass operation
- PMID: 11178293
Clinical outcome of patients with and without renal impairment undergoing a minimally invasive LIMA-to-LAD bypass operation
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with renal impairment undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have a significant risk of postoperative deterioration of kidney function. We investigated the outcome of patients with and without renal impairment treated by off-pump coronary artery surgery.
Methods: From January 1997 until January 2000, 158 consecutive patients (mean age 63 +/- 9.8 years, 126 male, 32 female) underwent minimally LIMA-to-LAD bypass operations. The patients were divided into three groups: group I patients (n = 133) had a preoperative creatinine of < 1.3 mg/dL, group II patients (n = 21) had a creatinine of > 1.3 mg/dL, and patients of group III (n = 4) required chronic dialysis due to terminal kidney dysfunction. Monitoring of the blood creatinine was performed during the entire hospital stay. A postoperative angiogram was performed in 113 of the 158 patients.
Results: All operations were performed without intraoperative complications. Postoperative angiograms revealed a patent LIMA-to-LAD bypass in all but one patient, who demonstrated a dissection of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. Mean creatinine value on admission was 1.0 +/- 0.1 mg/dL in group I and 2.7 +/- 1.9 mg/dL in group II. The maximal postoperative creatinine value was 1.1 +/- 0.4 mg/dL in group I and 2.9 +/- 2.7 mg/dL in group II. Neither hemofiltration nor hemodialysis was necessary in any patient of group I or group II during the postoperative course.
Conclusion: Minimally invasive LIMA-to-LAD bypass is a safe and effective procedure with low morbidity and no mortality in the first 158 patients. Preoperative renal impairment had no adverse effect on outcome or residual kidney function. Thus, higher doses of diuretics and hemofiltration/dialysis were not used, resulting in a cost reduction. Therefore, this approach may be worthwhile to consider in patients with significant renal impairment who have to undergo CABG.
Similar articles
-
Preoperative 3D-reconstructions of ultrafast-CT images for the planning of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass operation (MIDCAB).Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(2):111-5. Heart Surg Forum. 1998. PMID: 11276449 Clinical Trial.
-
Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):563-70. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118466. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11579343
-
Beating heart operations including hybrid revascularization: initial experiences.Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Sep;66(3):1076-81. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00714-0. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998. PMID: 9769007
-
Intraoperative angiography leads to graft revision in coronary artery bypass surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):502-5; discussion 505. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.004. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276506 Review.
-
[Symptomatic coronary patient with pathological coronary angiogram requiring surgery].Herz. 2000 Nov;25(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/pl00001986. Herz. 2000. PMID: 11141681 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):CD003590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003590.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24027097 Free PMC article.