Revision of failed metal-backed patellar component of Miller/Galante-I total knee prosthesis
- PMID: 11180899
- DOI: 10.1007/s007760070020
Revision of failed metal-backed patellar component of Miller/Galante-I total knee prosthesis
Abstract
Of 38 Miller/Galante-I total knee prostheses implanted between 1987 and 1990, 20 (53%) were revised. Failed metal-backed patella (15 knees; 40%) was the most frequent reason for revision. In most patients, the components were found well fixed to bone. The purpose of this study was to describe the revision technique we used for failed metal-backed patella. Total revision of all components would be ideal. However, removal of all components results in large bone loss, large blood loss, and a longer operation time. Because of the patients' relatively old age (78.7 years), less demanding activities of daily life (ADL), and the lower body weight of the Japanese patient, we chose a less invasive approach. The revision technique had the following features: (1) the grooved femoral component was not replaced, (2) the failed patellar component was replaced by an all-polyethylene patella, (3) synovectomy was performed, and (4) realignment of patellar tracking was done by lateral release and medial imbrication of the quadriceps mechanism. The mean follow-up after revision was 2 years, 4 months, and good short-term results were obtained. This less invasive approach would be beneficial for elderly patients whose ADL are less demanding.
Comment in
-
Revision of failed metal-backed patellar component of Miller/Galante-I total knee prosthesis.J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(3):302-3. doi: 10.1007/s0077610060302. J Orthop Sci. 2001. PMID: 11484128 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcome of metal-backed cementless patellar components: the effect of implant design.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):239-44. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. PMID: 11716389
-
[Laxity and functional results of Miller-Galante total knee prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament sparing after a 6-year follow-up].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Dec;85(8):797-802. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999. PMID: 10637880 French.
-
Isolated revision of failed metal-backed patellar components: outcome with minimum 4-year follow-up.J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20(8):998-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.01.020. J Arthroplasty. 2005. PMID: 16376254
-
Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):41-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00007. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. PMID: 12533570 Clinical Trial.
-
Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):84-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092982.12414.a0. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. PMID: 14646744 Review.
Cited by
-
Two-stage revision knee arthroplasty for metallosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A case report.SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023 Jun 2;11:2050313X231177752. doi: 10.1177/2050313X231177752. eCollection 2023. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37325170 Free PMC article.
-
Isolated all-polyethylene patellar revisions for metal-backed patellar failure.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2784-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0414-1. Epub 2008 Aug 8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008. PMID: 18688690 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources