Effect of number of stimuli and timing of twitch application on variability in interpolated twitch torque
- PMID: 11181617
- DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.3.1036
Effect of number of stimuli and timing of twitch application on variability in interpolated twitch torque
Abstract
Application of a supramaximal electrical twitch to the voluntarily contracted muscle is used to assess the level of muscle activation. Large variability in the interpolated twitch torque (ITT) has been observed when repeated stimulations are performed. It is hypothesized that this variability in ITT is caused by the stochastic nature of the timing of twitch application relative to pulses of voluntary excitation trains. Two experiments were performed on 12 subjects each to test this hypothesis. For the first experiment, a single twitch was superimposed on a train stimulation at different time intervals relative to the train pulses. For the second experiment, single, double, triple, or quadruple twitches were applied on a voluntarily contracted muscle. The ITT critically depended on the time point of twitch application: a single pulse applied 5 ms before a train pulse consistently evoked higher ITTs than all other stimulation conditions. Furthermore, variability of the ITT decreased as the number of applied twitches increased. The results support the hypothesis that a large part of the variability in the ITT may be caused by the timing of the superimposed twitch relative to the motor unit trains. The variability may be reduced by increasing the number of superimposed twitches.
Similar articles
-
Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique.Sports Med. 2004;34(4):253-67. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00005. Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15049717 Review.
-
Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique.J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Nov;81(5):2267-73. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2267. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996. PMID: 8941554 Clinical Trial.
-
Variability in the interpolated twitch torque for maximal and submaximal voluntary contractions.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1648-55. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01189.2002. Epub 2003 May 30. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003. PMID: 12777410
-
Effect of stimulation intensity on assessment of voluntary activation.Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jun;45(6):841-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.23343. Muscle Nerve. 2012. PMID: 22581538
-
Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction.Sports Med. 2005;35(11):951-66. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535110-00003. Sports Med. 2005. PMID: 16271009 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique.Sports Med. 2004;34(4):253-67. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00005. Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15049717 Review.
-
Age-related Deficits in Voluntary Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Mar;52(3):549-560. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002179. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020. PMID: 31688647 Free PMC article.
-
Relative Neuroadaptive Effect of Resistance Training along the Descending Neuroaxis in Older Adults.Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):679. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040679. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37190644 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conventionally assessed voluntary activation does not represent relative voluntary torque production.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jun;100(3):309-20. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0425-8. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17357793 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Characteristics of motor unit recruitment in boys and men at maximal and submaximal force levels.Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1289-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05508-z. Epub 2019 Mar 11. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 30859239
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources