Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Mar;56(3):212-7.
doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.212.

Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study

A Gregor  1 , C S Thomson, D H Brewster, P L Stroner, J Davidson, R J Fergusson, R Milroy; Scottish Cancer Trials Lung Group; Scottish Cancer Therapy Network
Affiliations

Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study

A Gregor et al. Thorax. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients with lung cancer in Scotland is poor and not improving. This study was designed to document factors influencing referral, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and survival in patients with lung cancer.

Methods: Patients diagnosed during 1995 were identified from the Scottish Cancer Registry and their medical records were reviewed. Adequate records were available in 91.2% of all potentially eligible cases.

Results: In 1995, patients in Scotland with lung cancer had a high rate of microscopic verification (74.1%) and 75.3% were assessed by a respiratory physician; however, only 56.8% received active treatment (resection 10.7%, radiotherapy 35.8%, chemotherapy 16.1%) and 2.9% participated in a clinical trial. Survival was poor with a median of 3.6 months; 21.1% (95% CI 19.8% to 22.4%) were alive at 1 year and 7.0% (95% CI 6.2% to 7.8%) at 3 years. Management by respiratory physician, oncologist, or thoracic surgeon was an independent predictor of access to potentially curative treatment and better survival.

Conclusion: This national population based study demonstrates low use of treatment, poor survival, and the influence of process of care on survival. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines will require substantial changes in practice. Increasing the number of patients who receive treatment may improve survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Lung cancer survival.
    Satoh H, Yamashita YT, Sekizawa K. Satoh H, et al. Thorax. 2001 Sep;56(9):742. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.742a. Thorax. 2001. PMID: 11563364 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Health Bull (Edinb). 1993 Mar;51(2):72-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1993;5(2):72-9 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1996 Jun;51(6):564-8 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1996 Jun;51(6):569-74 - PubMed
    1. Lung Cancer. 1997 Jun;17 Suppl 1:S3-10 - PubMed