Do primary care physicians or specialists provide more efficient care?

Abstract

Sinusitis is a common health complaint and expenditures for its treatment are high; thus, it is necessary to promote efficient practice behaviours in managing patient care. This study compares resource utilization between primary care physicians and specialists in the treatment of Medicaid sinusitis patients in Virginia. Physician-level data from Virginia Medicaid claim files for 1993 were analysed. The efficiency frontier, representing the best achievable performance in the use of resources for treating sinusitis, is identified using Data Envelopment Analysis. Resource utilization (primary care physician visits, specialist visits, emergency room usage, prescriptions and laboratory tests) and corresponding costs are compared between generalists and otolaryngologists. It was concluded from this study that there are no discernible differences in technical efficiency between generalists and specialists in the treatment of sinusitis. Nevertheless, otolaryngologists are found to be more costly than generalists in treating sinusitis. Variation in both caseload and patient mix might explain variation in use of resources.