The irrelevant sound effect: does speech play a special role?
- PMID: 11185795
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1750
The irrelevant sound effect: does speech play a special role?
Abstract
Memory for order is markedly impaired by the presence of irrelevant sound, even though participants are instructed to ignore the sound. Although a great deal of research has disclosed some features of the task and of the sound that augment or reduce the degree of interference, one important issue of the irrelevant sound effect not yet resolved is whether speech has a special status. This study revealed, within a design of adequate power, that the same physical stimulus (sine wave speech), whether perceived as speech or as nonspeech sound, produces similar degrees of disruption and is less disruptive of serial recall than natural speech. This outcome suggests that the acoustic constituents of sound rather than its source are most influential in determining the impact of irrelevant material.
Similar articles
-
Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Aug;25(4):1005-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999. PMID: 10464942
-
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 36190658 Free PMC article.
-
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):841-848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0806-8. Mem Cognit. 2018. PMID: 29600481
-
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):550-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03214370. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000. PMID: 11082864 Review.
-
Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.Scand J Psychol. 1992 Sep;33(3):212-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00911.x. Scand J Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1488646 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Auditory Distraction on Working Memory, Attention Switching, and Listening Comprehension.Audiol Res. 2021 May 28;11(2):227-243. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11020021. Audiol Res. 2021. PMID: 34071364 Free PMC article.
-
Expansion in speech time can restore comprehension in a simultaneously speaking bilingual robot.Front Robot AI. 2023 Mar 1;9:1032811. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1032811. eCollection 2022. Front Robot AI. 2023. PMID: 36935651 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46641-7. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31308413 Free PMC article.
-
Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):352-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03193456. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 17645176
-
Sound masking by a low-pitch speech-shaped noise improves a social robot's talk in noisy environments.Front Robot AI. 2024 Jan 9;10:1205209. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1205209. eCollection 2023. Front Robot AI. 2024. PMID: 38263959 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources