The costs of cancer to a major employer in the United States: a case-control analysis
- PMID: 11185849
The costs of cancer to a major employer in the United States: a case-control analysis
Abstract
Background: Detailed data will be increasingly important in determining the cost of cancer care in the managed care setting.
Objectives: To estimate the full cost of cancer to a major employer in the United States and to determine the nature of the expenditures.
Study design: Analysis of medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims data from 1995 to 1997 for a major employer with more than 100,000 employees.
Methods: The cost of cancer is determined on a per-patient and per-employee basis. Based on a case-control method, cancer patients are matched to individuals with no record of cancer diagnosis or treatment. The incremental cost per employee and the percentage of total healthcare expenditures for cancer are quantified.
Results: Approximately $224 per active employee, or 6.5% of the corporation's total healthcare costs, was spent on incremental care for cancer patients in 1997. Medical conditions not directly related to cancer account for approximately half the total excess expenditures for patients with cancer. On average, annual healthcare and disability costs for persons with cancer were approximately 5 times higher than for their counterparts without cancer.
Conclusions: The costs of cancer care are a substantial proportion of healthcare costs for employers. When the full cost of cancer is included in a cost-benefit analysis, expenditures for programs to reduce the risk of cancer in the working population may be justified. Expenditures to reduce the incidence and severity of conditions indirectly associated with cancer may also reduce overall employer healthcare expenses.
Similar articles
-
Cost of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease to the employer: a perspective from the United States.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 15;26(6):889-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03428.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17767473
-
The economic consequences of irritable bowel syndrome: a US employer perspective.Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):929-35. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.929. Arch Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12719202
-
The burden of illness associated with renal cell carcinoma in the United States.Urol Oncol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.02.014. Urol Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17826652
-
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017. Diabetes Care. 2008. PMID: 18308683 Review.
-
Value and cancer care: toward an equitable future.Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;16(24):6004-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1643. Clin Cancer Res. 2010. PMID: 21169254 Review.
Cited by
-
Economic implications of treatment-resistant depression among employees.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):363-73. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099122
-
State-level estimates of cancer-related absenteeism costs.J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Sep;55(9):1015-20. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a2a467. J Occup Environ Med. 2013. PMID: 23969498 Free PMC article.
-
Lower respiratory tract infections: impact on the workplace.Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):749-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321100-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003. PMID: 12828496
-
Cost of stress urinary incontinence: a claims data analysis.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2):95-105. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422020-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 14731051
-
Case-control studies in pharmacoeconomic research: an overview.Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(8):627-34. doi: 10.2165/11314780-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009. PMID: 19712006 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources