Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000:98:439-69.

The measurement of patient-reported outcomes of refractive surgery: the refractive status and vision profile

Affiliations

The measurement of patient-reported outcomes of refractive surgery: the refractive status and vision profile

O D Schein. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a questionnaire, the Refractive Status and Vision Profile (RSVP), to assess health-related quality of life associated with refractive error and its correction.

Methods: The published literature on patient report of visual and overall function was reviewed, and the RSVP was self-administered by 550 participants with refractive error. Cross-sectional validation was performed using standard psychometric techniques. The responsiveness of the RSVP to surgical intervention was assessed prospectively in a subset of 176 patients. The principal outcomes measures were scores on the overall RSVP scale (S) and on 8 RSVP subscales (functioning, driving, concern, expectations, symptoms, glare, optical problems, problems with corrective lenses).

Results: The RSVP (S) and its subscales demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.70-0.93). S and several subscale scores were independently associated with satisfaction with vision and were more correlated with satisfaction with vision than with either visual acuity or refractive error. Higher refractive error was associated with lower scores on S and on 5 subscales. In the prospective surgical cohort, 15% of patients had some worsening in their total RSVP score; however, substantial variation was seen in the individual subscales where worsening ranged from 7% (problems with corrective lenses) to 41% (driving). The effect size (measure of responsiveness) of the RSVP and most of its subscales was very high. Approximately 14% of patients had significant worsening in 3 or more subscales, and this outcome was found to be independently associated with being dissatisfied with vision following surgery (OR, 5.84; 95% CI, 1.88, 8.13).

Conclusions: The RSVP has been validated as a questionnaire that measures patient-reported quality of life related to refractive error and its correction. It is responsive to surgical intervention and provides important information regarding patient outcomes not available from standard clinical measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Refract Surg. 1996 Feb;12(2):240-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jul;128(1):38-44 - PubMed
    1. J Refract Surg. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(3):341-6 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996 May;27(5 Suppl):S421-8 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1996 Sep;103(9):1337-47 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources