Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated
- PMID: 11194078
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x
Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated
Abstract
Opinions about cervical screening in the UK tend to follow one of two negative lines of thought. The first is that cervical cancer is a rare disease, and too much time and effort are spent on screening. The second is that it has been relatively ineffective, since incidence of invasive carcinoma did not fall until the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) was introduced in 1988, although it fell by 40% since then. This paper presents publicly available data to demonstrate that neither of these views is true. Registrations of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix and carcinoma in situ in England and Wales between 1971 and 1996 show that a substantially increased risk of disease in women born since 1940 has been reversed, almost certainly by greatly improved screening. Cervical carcinoma is now a rare disease because most cases are prevented before they become invasive, mostly by screening young women, aged 20-40, before the decade of life when symptomatic cervical carcinoma most frequently presents.
Similar articles
-
The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK.Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):249-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16674-9. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15262102
-
The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;92(2):150-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01067.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985. PMID: 3970894
-
Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.BJOG. 2001 Apr;108(4):388-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00098.x. BJOG. 2001. PMID: 11305546
-
Cervical screening in England and Wales: an update.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;16(6):491-6. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200412000-00010. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15534446 Review.
-
Cervical screening in the UK and laboratory quality control in the context of the 2007 European guidelines.Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:41-6. Coll Antropol. 2007. PMID: 17598504 Review.
Cited by
-
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD012847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012847. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29095502 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment using a hyperthermia device that uses heat induced by alternating magnetic fields.Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;5(2):310-316. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.929. Epub 2016 Jun 13. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27446569 Free PMC article.