Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2493-500.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1310.

Molecular and morphological evidence on the phylogeny of the Elephantidae

Affiliations

Molecular and morphological evidence on the phylogeny of the Elephantidae

M G Thomas et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The African and Asian elephants and the mammoth diverged ca. 4-6 million years ago and their phylogenetic relationship has been controversial. Morphological studies have suggested a mammoth Asian elephant relationship, while molecular studies have produced conflicting results. We obtained cytochrome b sequences of up to 545 base pairs from five mammoths, 14 Asian and eight African elephants. A high degree of polymorphism is detected within species. With a dugong sequence used as the outgroup, parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses support a mammoth African elephant clade. As the dugong is a very distant outgroup, we employ likelihood analysis to root the tree with a molecular clock, and use bootstrap and Bayesian analyses to quantify the relative support for different topologies. The analyses support the mammoth African elephant relationship, although other trees cannot be rejected. Ancestral polymorphisms may have resulted in gene trees differing from the species phylogeny Examination of morphological data, especially from primitive fossil members, indicates that some supposed synapomorphies between the mammoth and Asian elephant are variable, others convergent or autapomorphous. A mammoth African elephant relationship is not excluded. Our results highlight the need, in both morphological and molecular phylogenetics, for multiple markers and close attention to within-taxon variation and outgroup selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1466-73 - PubMed
    1. C R Acad Sci III. 1999 Jun;322(6):447-54 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457-65 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1984 Apr 5-11;308(5959):543-4 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74 - PubMed

Publication types