Suppression of ethanol responding by centrally administered CTOP and naltrindole in AA and Wistar rats
- PMID: 11198711
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02123.x
Suppression of ethanol responding by centrally administered CTOP and naltrindole in AA and Wistar rats
Abstract
Background: Both mu- and delta-opioid receptors have been implicated in the reinforcing actions of ethanol. However, selective opioid receptor antagonists have not altered ethanol intake in all rodent strains consistently, which suggests that genotype may modulate their suppressive effects. Therefore, we tested the effects of the selective mu-antagonist D-Pen-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP) and the selective delta-antagonist naltrindole in both high-drinking AA (Alko, Alcohol) and heterogeneous Wistar rats.
Methods: AA and Wistar rats were trained to respond for ethanol (10% w/v) in a two-lever operant condition by using a saccharin fading procedure. After stable baseline responding was established, rats were implanted stereotaxically either with a guide cannula above the lateral ventricle or with bilateral cannulas above the nucleus accumbens, basolateral amygdala, or ventral tegmental area. After postoperative recovery, AA and Wistar animals were tested after intracerebroventricular microinjections of either CTOP (0-3 microg) or naltrindole (0-30 microg) or subcutaneous injections of naloxone (0-1 g/kg), which was used as a reference antagonist. Effects of intracerebral microinjections of CTOP and naltrindole (both 0-500 ng) were tested only in Wistar rats.
Results: Subcutaneous naloxone and intracerebroventricular CTOP and naltrindole suppressed ethanol self-administration in a similar manner in AA and Wistar rats. Cumulative response patterns indicated that naloxone and naltrindole had no effect on the initiation of responding but suppressed it later during the session, whereas CTOP also affected initiation. In Wistar rats, naltrindole microinjections into both the nucleus accumbens and basolateral amygdala decreased ethanol responding, whereas CTOP was effective only in the amygdala. Injections of these antagonists into the ventral tegmental area had little effect on ethanol intake.
Conclusions: The results confirm previous results which showed that both mu- and delta-opioid receptors are involved in the regulation of ethanol self-administration and indicate that genetic differences between AA and Wistar rats produced by selection do not modify the effects of opioid antagonists. The nucleus accumbens and the basolateral amygdala may be important central sites for the mediation of their suppressive effects.
Similar articles
-
Effect of selective blockade of mu(1) or delta opioid receptors on reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behavior by drug-associated stimuli in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002 Sep;27(3):391-9. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00302-0. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002. PMID: 12225696
-
Central administration of an opiate antagonist decreases oral ethanol self-administration in rats.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Sep;23(9):1468-76. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999. PMID: 10512312
-
Roles of opioid receptor subtypes in mediating alcohol-seeking induced by discrete cues and context.Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Aug;30(4):671-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06851.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Eur J Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19686472 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol reinforcement and voluntary ethanol consumption.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 May;25(5 Suppl ISBRA):117S-126S. doi: 10.1097/00000374-200105051-00021. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001. PMID: 11391060 Review.
-
Role of mu and delta opioid receptors in alcohol drinking behaviour.Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2008 Jun;1(2):239-52. doi: 10.2174/1874473710801020239. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2008. PMID: 19630722 Review.
Cited by
-
δ-opioid receptor function in the dorsal striatum plays a role in high levels of ethanol consumption in rats.J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;32(13):4540-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5345-11.2012. J Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22457501 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of rearing conditions on behaviour and endogenous opioids in rats with alcohol access during adolescence.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 2;8(10):e76591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076591. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24098535 Free PMC article.
-
Opioids in the nucleus accumbens stimulate ethanol intake.Physiol Behav. 2009 Oct 19;98(4):453-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Aug 6. Physiol Behav. 2009. PMID: 19647755 Free PMC article.
-
Ontogenetic differences in ethanol's motivational properties during infancy.Alcohol. 2012 May;46(3):225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2011.09.026. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Alcohol. 2012. PMID: 22440692 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptualizing withdrawal-induced escalation of alcohol self-administration as a learned, plasticity-dependent process.Alcohol. 2012 Jun;46(4):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Mar 28. Alcohol. 2012. PMID: 22459874 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials