Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis
- PMID: 11200207
- DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2001.18749
Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis
Abstract
Over the past decade, bone density scanning has come to be seen as an essential part of the evaluation of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Although dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the technique most associated with the recent growth in bone densitometry, several innovative devices for performing measurements at sites in the peripheral skeleton are also available. This article examines the question of whether there is any one method or measurement site that performs better than all the others at identifying patients at risk of fracture. Given that it is essential to make greater use of the small, low-cost peripheral devices if the many millions of women most at risk are to be identified and treated, what approaches to the interpretation of bone density scans can be adopted to ensure the greatest degree of consistency among different methods? Finally, does it matter if the imperfect correlation among different types of measurement results in different patients being selected for treatment on the basis of different techniques?
Similar articles
-
The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):406-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.062. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Eur J Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19647962 Review.
-
Of small bones and big mistakes; bone densitometry in children revisited.Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.017. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Eur J Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19647963 Review.
-
Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use?J Clin Densitom. 2001 Summer;4(2):83-96. doi: 10.1385/jcd:4:2:083. J Clin Densitom. 2001. PMID: 11477301 Review.
-
Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998 Jun;27(2):267-88. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70005-0. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9669138 Review.
-
Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S47-9. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0074-1. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013. PMID: 24046042
Cited by
-
[Predictive value of ultra-sound densitometry as a method of selective screening for osteoporosis in primary care].Aten Primaria. 2007 Dec;39(12):655-9. doi: 10.1157/13113959. Aten Primaria. 2007. PMID: 18093504 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
Changes in distribution of bone densitometry equipment from 1996 to 2006 in Japan.J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00774-009-0099-x. Epub 2009 Jun 17. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010. PMID: 19633809
-
The effectiveness of bone mineral density as supplementary tool for evaluation of the osteogenic potential in patients with spinal fusion.Asian Spine J. 2009 Jun;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.4184/asj.2009.3.1.1. Epub 2009 Jun 30. Asian Spine J. 2009. PMID: 20404939 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Mar;63(3):285-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.005678. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004. PMID: 14962964 Free PMC article.
-
Parameter estimation-based discrimination method for osteoporosis stage with ultrasound bone densitometer.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):23022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72891-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39362943 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous