Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jan 9;164(1):24-8.

Undiagnosed diabetes: does it matter?

Affiliations

Undiagnosed diabetes: does it matter?

T K Young et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The 1998 Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes lowered the cutoff point for diagnosing diabetes mellitus from a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level of 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/L. We studied the prevalence and clinical outcomes of undiagnosed and diagnosed diabetes within specific ranges of FPG among a cohort of subjects recruited in 1990.

Methods: In 1990 a representative sample of 2792 adult residents of Manitoba participated in the Manitoba Heart Health Survey, which included measurement of FPG and a question about each participant's past history of diabetes. Individuals who would now be classified as having undiagnosed diabetes under the new criteria were not considered as such in 1990. Through data linkage with the provincial health care utilization database, the use of health care by these individuals was tracked and compared with that of individuals whose diabetes had been diagnosed and with that of normoglycemic individuals over an 8-year period subsequent to the survey.

Results: The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the adult population of Manitoba was 2.2%. Undiagnosed cases accounted for about one-third of all diabetes cases. Individuals with undiagnosed diabetes had an unfavourable lipid profile and higher blood pressure and obesity indices than normoglycemic individuals. Individuals who satisfied the new criteria for diabetes but remained undiagnosed had an additional 1.35 physician visits per year (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.93-1.96) and were more likely to be admitted to hospital at least once (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 0.40-3.79), compared with normoglycemic individuals.

Interpretation: Undiagnosed cases represent the unseen but clinically important burden of diabetes, with significant concurrent metabolic derangements and a long-term impact on health care use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the adult population of Manitoba, according to the 1997 ADA criteria. IFG = impaired fasting glucose, UnDxDM = undiagnosed diabetes, DxDM = diagnosed diabetes.
None
Fig. 2: Probability of survival among survey cohort members. Non-DM = nondiabetic individuals, DM-new = all individuals considered to have diabetes according to the new criteria, DM-old = all individuals considered to have diabetes according to the old criteria.

References

    1. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 1998;21:518-24. - PubMed
    1. Harris MI. Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues. Diabetes Care 1993;16:642-52. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus. Second report. Geneva: The Organization; 1985. - PubMed
    1. Meltzer S, Leiter L, Daneman D, Gerstein HC, Lau D, Ludwig S, et al. 1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. CMAJ 1998;159(8 Suppl):S1-29. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-159/issue-8/diabetescpg/index.htm - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Preport of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1183-97. - PubMed

Publication types