Economic and outcomes assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of headache
- PMID: 11202760
- PMCID: PMC2568332
Economic and outcomes assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of headache
Abstract
We sought to evaluate the economic impact and diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of patients with headache and nonfocal physical examinations. Computerized medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 1,233 patients presenting for MRI of headache at our institution over a 3-year period (1992-1995). Patients with focal findings at physical examination, prior brain surgery, head trauma, or immunocompromise were excluded. A model was developed to assess the cost associated with the MR test results, and actual average institutional costs of performing an examination applied. Correlative statistical analysis of referring specialties and positive tests was also performed. Three hundred twenty-eight patients who met the above criteria were retained in the sample. One hundred sixty-three patients (50%) had negative MR test results. Of the 50% of patients with positive studies, only 5 (1.5%) had clinically significant MR results. The average cost of an MR examination was 517 dollars (1998 dollars). The cost per clinically significant managed case detected was 34,535 dollars. No statistically significant difference was found among referring specialties and clinically significant MR results. Our results indicate that MRI of nonfocal headache yields a low percentage of positive clinically significant results and has limited cost-effectiveness. Referring specialty had no significant bearing on these outcomes, regardless of specialist experience.
Similar articles
-
Computed tomography imaging in the management of headache in the emergency department: cost efficacy and policy implications.J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;101(4):331-5. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30880-4. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19397223
-
The diagnostic and economic yield of neuroimaging in neuro-ophthalmology.J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(2):139-44. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31824e3753. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22510684
-
Routine magnetic resonance imaging for idiopathic olfactory loss: a modeling-based economic evaluation.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;140(10):911-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1883. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 25211179
-
MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic or recurrent headache.Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):575-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352032121. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15858096 Review.
-
Cost containment and diffusion of MRI: oil and water?. Japanese experience.Eur Radiol. 1997;7 Suppl 5:256-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00006904. Eur Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9370555 Review.
Cited by
-
Headache and Neuroimaging: Why We Continue to Do It.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jul;41(7):1149-1155. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6591. Epub 2020 Jul 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32616575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Has China's Healthcare Reform Reduced the Number of Patients in Large General Hospitals?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5428. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095428. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564824 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis.Emerg Radiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s10140-015-1314-9. Epub 2015 Apr 12. Emerg Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25863687
-
Two-tiered approach to MRI for headache: a cost-effective way to use an expensive technology.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):W75-80. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10238. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. PMID: 23789700 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography in management of patients with non-localizing headache.Oman Med J. 2014 Jan;29(1):28-31. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.07. Oman Med J. 2014. PMID: 24498479 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous